Half-Life 2: Episode One Update

A new Steam Update (thanks Frans) on Half-Life 2: Episode One discusses the add-on's plot and describes Valve's frustration at Half-Life 2's six-year development cycle as one reason for the move to episodic content. The update includes a thumbnail with a broken link to this screenshot and a broken link to the recent Robin Walker Q&A on Computer and Video Games.
View : : :
10.
 
Re: No subject
Feb 27, 2006, 13:03
10.
Re: No subject Feb 27, 2006, 13:03
Feb 27, 2006, 13:03
 
Let me be the first to say that you are blind. You conveniently forget that some other game developers produce way better games in a shorter timespan and gives the player wonderful hours of it without charging the player exorbitant prices.

I wonder if it were another developer, would you say the same thing or start flaming them for it.

To me, it does seem to look like Valve is milking their cash cow for all that it's worth. They have spent quite a number of years building the new engine and putting in new technology in such as hi-def and such, so why can't they use what they have built and produce good content with a good amount of gameplay hours and make it in to a longer game rather than breaking it up in to episodes. They're saying that Half-Life 2 took 6 years to make, which I believe was due to the engine, physics and gameplay mechanics, not content.
Now that they already have the base to build the content, why aren't they using it to make a longer game in a shorter time ? Most of the features are already in place (Object Oriented anyone), so all they actually need to do is create the story, design the gameplay, create a bit of new art, make the plot, etc.

Well the answer is simple. They want more money for less work. It's simple as that, and they will keep doing it as long as people like you seem to agree with their methods.

Let me ask you this question, would you rather pay $20 for one episode (How many episodes are there going to be ?) or a full game for $49.99-59.99 ?

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
2.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
9.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
13.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
3.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
4.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
5.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
6.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
7.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
     Re: No subject
8.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
      Re: No subject
 10.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
     Re: No subject
15.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
      Re: No subject
16.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
      Re: No subject
17.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
       Always a smile
18.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
        More = Less
19.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
         Re: More = Less
23.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
         Re: More = Less
24.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
          Re: More = Less
11.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
12.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
14.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
20.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
21.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
22.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
25.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
27.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
   Re: ...
29.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
26.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
28.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
30.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
33.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
35.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
36.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
32.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
31.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
34.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
37.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
38.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
39.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
43.
Feb 28, 2006Feb 28 2006
40.
Feb 27, 2006Feb 27 2006
41.
Feb 28, 2006Feb 28 2006
42.
Feb 28, 2006Feb 28 2006
44.
Feb 28, 2006Feb 28 2006
45.
Feb 28, 2006Feb 28 2006