I think most of you are missing the point. It's not about how red cross wants to monopolize their symbol, it's about trying to keep the organization as neutral as possible.
I think it is perfectly logical for them to try and keep the symbol out of non-documentairy war movies, war games ect. And the two screenshots the guy links to, are exellent examples of why another symbol should be used. (Blue cross for instance). Since red cross obviously do not want to be associated with militia style gun wielding medics
(I know it's a bit far fetched but you get the point).
I really don't see the huge problem with inventing some other symbol that would be nearly, perhaps not exactly, as recognisable as the red cross, for medpacks, medics ect.
Excuse my spelling
I'm just a simple dane.