UT2007 PC First & Demo Plans

UT2K7 Released first on PS3 or PC on the Atari Forums (thanks Frans and GameGossip) has word from Epic that Unreal Tournament 2007 will be released on PCs before consoles, and that there are plans to precede the game's release with a demo:
PC first. We're not scheduled to be a ps3 launch title, not certain where those news sites are getting that from. There will be a pre-release demo (on the PC at least).
View : : :
35.
 
meh..
Jan 2, 2006, 19:34
35.
meh.. Jan 2, 2006, 19:34
Jan 2, 2006, 19:34
 
Unreal's graphics were bad ass. And the game rocked too. UT when I first saw the screenshots looked nice (but at that point, I thought it was just a free add on to unreal too). when it finally got released and quake3 had been out, I didn't care for it. UT lacked quite a bit in its character, and the engine didn't have anything special really. Nothing like quake3's curved surfaces (why the hell has that droped compleatly off the face of the earth? Even today games are plagued with the crapiest looking arched windows and crap) and high resolution textures. UT levels were VERY bland looking with repeated textures everywhere. Game play wise it was pretty good.. but so was unreal and all the quake games...well.. 2 being the low point.

How ever I am a HUGE fan of UT2k3 and 4 and will have a nice x800xt waiting for the bundle of joy known as ut2k7 when it comes out!

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
3.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
9.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
21.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
20.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
54.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
56.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
60.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
71.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
58.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
62.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
63.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
65.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
66.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
     Pawned !
67.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
     Re: No subject
70.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
      Re: No subject
72.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
       Re: No subject
73.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
        Re: No subject
75.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
        Re: No subject
64.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
2.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
4.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
5.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
6.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
7.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
8.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
13.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
10.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
11.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
12.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
14.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
15.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
16.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
17.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
18.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
19.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
25.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
26.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
   Re: ...
27.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
55.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
59.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
   Re: ...
61.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
    Re: ...
74.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
    Re: ...
22.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
23.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
24.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
40.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
42.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
43.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
     Re: No subject
46.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
28.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
30.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
31.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
32.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
   Re: ...
57.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
29.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
33.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
34.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
36.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
 35.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
meh..
37.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
38.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
39.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
   Re: meh..
41.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
   Re: meh..
44.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
47.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
48.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
45.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
49.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
50.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
51.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
53.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
52.
Jan 2, 2006Jan 2 2006
68.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
69.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
76.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
77.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
78.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
79.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
80.
Jan 3, 2006Jan 3 2006
81.
Jan 4, 2006Jan 4 2006
82.
Jan 4, 2006Jan 4 2006