Spector Goes Source

Junction Point Studios, the new developer formed by industry luminary Warren Spector, sends word on some job openings they are looking to fill that reveals a bit more about their plans for the future. The positions they are advertising are for a Source-engine game that will be released via Valve's Steam network. The openings are for a game artist and level builders, but the job descriptions do little to reveal more about the nature of the unannounced project. Those interested in applying should contact jobs@junctionpoint.com. Update: This info is now available on their jobs page.
View : : :
35.
 
Re: Shame
Nov 22, 2005, 13:01
35.
Re: Shame Nov 22, 2005, 13:01
Nov 22, 2005, 13:01
 
Your aversion to Steam has become not only tiresome but also borderline irrational.

Being a fanboy is irrational.
Not wanting to ask permission to play a game I paid good money for? Rational.

You can look that up if you like.

The Steam haters will have no choice but to adopt Steam eventually

I find that highly unlikely, but I suppose if 100% of all the games in the universe required Steam, I'd be likely to adopt it, yes.

I would still, of course, complain about it. So nobody gets off that easy.

what exactly was the matter with what Sony did? Doesn't a corporation have a "right" to protect itself or does the "rights" of the consumer override that?

Your views on Steam suddenly make complete sense to me now.


Date
Subject
Author
1.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
2.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
4.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
5.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
30.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
31.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
33.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
34.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
3.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
6.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
7.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
8.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
9.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
   Re: Shame
10.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
11.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
   Re: Shame
12.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
   Re: Shame
13.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
16.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
   Re: Shame
17.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
    Re: Shame
19.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
     Re: Shame
62.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
      Re: Shame
63.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
       Re:
22.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
     Re: Shame
23.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
      Re: Shame
25.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
       Re: Shame
26.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
        Re: Shame
28.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
         Re: Shame
32.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
          Re: Shame
42.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
           Re: Shame
44.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
          Re: Shame
53.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
           Re: Shame
24.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
      Re: Shame
20.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
    Re: Shame
29.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
    Re: Shame
58.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
    Re: Shame
65.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
   Re: Shame
67.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
    Re: Shame
68.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
     Re: Shame
69.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
      Spector
70.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
      Re: Shame
71.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
      Re: Shame
72.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
       Re: Shame
 35.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
 Re: Shame
36.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
46.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
   Re: Shame
14.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
15.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
21.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
37.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
38.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
39.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
41.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
     Re: No subject
18.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
27.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
40.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
43.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
45.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
47.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
48.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
66.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
49.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
50.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
61.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
64.
Nov 23, 2005Nov 23 2005
51.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
52.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
54.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
55.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
56.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
57.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
59.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
60.
Nov 22, 2005Nov 22 2005
73.
Nov 24, 2005Nov 24 2005
74.
Nov 26, 2005Nov 26 2005