So what? So the media is presenting a one sided report, what else is new? They've been doing that on every topic for as long as they've existed. None of the media reports matter one bit in the long run, despite the "influence" that Jack Thompson ascribes to himself.
It's not that it's one sided. Jack actually doesn't present a valid side in this debate.
He just presents the loudest and craziest.
Look, take three people on the street. One is playing a GameBoy and mostly minding his own business. The second has some research papers he'd like to discuss with you.
The third has a sandwich board on his chest proclaiming that the end is near and screaming that devices connected to televisions will train children to kill you.
Who gets the most attention? Sadly the third. But the people who actually do the work and research on the real sides of this debate aren't involved with him and increasingly want to have nothing to do with him.
So the only thing the mainstream media is accomplishing here is granting a lunatic a platform. They're not even airing the real debate.