But then, in the end, what does anything of what he has done, have to do with him being a lawyer? Why would any of that fall under the providence of the FBA anyways? Why would they disbar him? Because he takes an impopular stance? Last I checked, the man was free to voice his opinion. That the media humps his leg like a cash starved wh0re is sad, but that's the American media for you.
I don't think he really has done anything to merit his disbarment.
Please! That crackpot threatens legal action agains't everyone and their dog for very little reason. That's called barratry, and it's illegal in most jurisdictions. He's abusing his position as a lawyer to intimidate people with baseless lawsuit threats.
His total lack of professionalism also makes the FBA look really bad. He can't even comment on the issue without resorting to insults and personal attacks.
I say we let him and dsmart go at it in a steel caged octogon. If that ever happens, I'm watching it on pay per view.