Ships Ahoy - Day of Defeat: Source

Day of Defeat: Source is now via the Steam delivery service. Word on Steam News is:
Day of Defeat: Source is available now via Steam for just $19.95. If you have Steam installed, you can get Day of Defeat now! If you don't have Steam installed yet, click here for the Steam installer.
View : : :
156.
 
Re: No subject
Oct 3, 2005, 05:17
Re: No subject Oct 3, 2005, 05:17
Oct 3, 2005, 05:17
 
t still took 18 hours or more to download all of that content (if you have a standard 1.5MBps broadband connection). The fact that it may have happened before the official release is irrelevant. Technically, Valve could have made the game available as soon as you downloaded the files and not made you wait to a certain date to activate and decrypt them.

Saying that Steam is immediate is therefore a specious argument. It would be like me saying that retail is immediate because I have my butler stand outside the video game store when it opens, and he picks the game up and installs it on my PC so it is immediately ready to play when I get home.

??????

This right here shows your complete idiocy or desire to make up stuff out of thin air to argue against Valve.

If they hadn't done it that way you know full well you would be bitching about how it took 18 hours to download on the release day. Instead by allowing people to prep it ahead of time they where able to play it much earlier the night the release date hit (and if you remember they tried to unlock it over the weekend when the retail versions got put on the shelves early, but Vivendi said "no"... and I bet your going to come up with some tin foil method to turn even this around into a negative slash against valve).

Riley, you are a biased Valve hater. I'm just someone who's used their products succesfuly. It's as simple as that. You are completely blind. Someone buys a product and says, "Wow I really like everything I've bought from this company over the past 6-7 years, everything works great and does what I expect." Your going to stand there and tell them they're wrong? You don't even go for the "Well yeah but look at all these other cases where it didn't work right argument" like I was expecting. Instead you accuse me of being some poster child spokes person for Valve. Of course I'm happy with them... I've never had any reason not to be.

You either A) don't actualy hate valve, your just here stirring up the pot because you find it amusing, and I actualy think this is the more likely case because no one can be so B) Completely blinded by your own hatred made up in your head concerning Valve.

Anyways arguing with you isn't a discussion. It's just a case of you finding whatever you can pick and pull out of someone's post to use to make up stuff to make Valve look bad. I don't understand your desire to do this... but have fun. I'm out.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
2.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
3.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
4.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
71.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
72.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
5.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
6.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
7.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
8.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
10.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
14.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
15.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
     Re: No subject
17.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
      Re: No subject
18.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
       Re: No subject
19.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
        Re: No subject
21.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
         Re: No subject
22.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
         Re: No subject
23.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
          Re: No subject
24.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
           Re: No subject
25.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
            Re: No subject
26.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
             Re: No subject
27.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
             Re: No subject
29.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
            Re: No subject
13.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
9.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
11.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
12.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
16.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
20.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
28.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
30.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
31.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
32.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
33.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
34.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
55.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
58.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
35.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
36.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
51.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
52.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
54.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
37.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
38.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
39.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
42.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
40.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
41.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
43.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
46.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
47.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
44.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
45.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
50.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
53.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
56.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
57.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
     Re: No subject
59.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
      Re: No subject
60.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
       Re: No subject
62.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
       Re: No subject
66.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
        Re: No subject
48.
Sep 26, 2005Sep 26 2005
49.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
61.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
63.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
64.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
65.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
67.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
68.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
69.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
70.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
73.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
74.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
     Re: No subject
76.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
      Re: No subject
79.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
      Re: No subject
100.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
104.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
105.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
     Re: No subject
121.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
     Re: No subject
122.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
      Re: No subject
125.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
       Re: No subject
126.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
        Re: No subject
127.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
         Re: No subject
128.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
          Re: No subject
129.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
           Re: No subject
134.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
        Re: No subject
135.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
         Re: No subject
137.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
          Re: No subject
138.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
           Re: No subject
151.
Oct 1, 2005Oct 1 2005
            Re: No subject
139.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
           Re: No subject
140.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
            Re: No subject
141.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
            Re: No subject
144.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
             Re: No subject
145.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
              Re: No subject
146.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
               Re: No subject
142.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
            Re: No subject
143.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
             Re: No subject
152.
Oct 1, 2005Oct 1 2005
           Re: No subject
153.
Oct 1, 2005Oct 1 2005
            Re: No subject
154.
Oct 1, 2005Oct 1 2005
             Re: No subject
155.
Oct 2, 2005Oct 2 2005
              Re: No subject
 156.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
            Re: No subject
157.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
             Re: No subject
158.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
             Re: No subject
159.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
              Re: No subject
160.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
               Re: No subject
161.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
                Re: No subject
162.
Oct 3, 2005Oct 3 2005
                 Re: No subject
109.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
111.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
     Re: No subject
112.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
      Re: No subject
113.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
      Re: No subject
114.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
       Re: No subject
115.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
        Re: No subject
117.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
         Re: No subject
119.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
         Re: No subject
120.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
          Re: No subject
124.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
          Re: No subject
133.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
          Re: No subject
116.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
       Re: No subject
75.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
77.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
78.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
80.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
81.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
82.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
83.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
84.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
85.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
   Re: HDR
86.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
    Re: HDR
87.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
     Re: HDR
88.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
      Re: HDR
89.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
       Re: HDR
90.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
        Re: HDR
102.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
         Re: HDR
91.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
        Re: HDR
92.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
         Re: HDR
96.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
          ???
93.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
         Re: HDR
101.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
       Re: HDR
94.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
95.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
103.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
106.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
107.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
108.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
110.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
118.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
123.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
97.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
98.
Sep 27, 2005Sep 27 2005
99.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
130.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
131.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
132.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
136.
Sep 28, 2005Sep 28 2005
147.
Sep 29, 2005Sep 29 2005
148.
Sep 29, 2005Sep 29 2005
149.
Sep 30, 2005Sep 30 2005
150.
Sep 30, 2005Sep 30 2005
   Re: hmm