Quake II as an MMOG

alphaWorks OptimalGrid Overview has middleware code to operate Quake II as an MMOG, the latest fruits of efforts at IBM to facilitate games, in this case Quake II, on a grid of servers (story). Here's what they sent along about this:
OptimalGrid is a self-contained middleware designed for developers to create grid-enabled parallel applications without themselves becoming experts in grid or high-performance computing (article). The Linux compatible middleware now includes automatic distribution and provisioning on to Grid nodes. See how the first release of Quake II was made massively multi-player by running on a Grid. Get modified Quake II from Sourceforge to run with OptimalGrid and let the massive Grid games begin.
View : : :
35.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 18, 2005, 12:33
35.
Re: No subject Sep 18, 2005, 12:33
Sep 18, 2005, 12:33
 
It doesn't matter that we're not 'pronouncing' everything on here, MeatFarts (if that is your real name.) The level of informality we're using and the nature of the board indicates that this is a conversational type of dialogue. How else would you explain even your OWN post starting with 'Ah yes!' That's a casual and conversational exclamation if I ever heard one, used only in conversations. This is not even looking at your own puncutation mistakes.

So your own argument about 'responsibility of the author to construct proper sentences' is bunk, because you yourself are writing much closer to a conversational level of informality than any kind of other documentation, like technical English, etc.

I recommend you stay away from trying to analyze sociological or pragmatic linguistics when you obviously trying to talk above a level you're comfortable with, because you're making basically no sense.


Wow, human.. You're really on the ball here yourself.

Thank you for putting me so firmly in my place... nearly 1/2 a day after I had not only explained that I'm well aware we are not bound by the conventions of formally written English around here (perhaps it was my usage of such impenetrably colloquial French that threw you off %)), BUT HAD ALREADY DISCOVERED FOR MYSELF THAT I WAS WRONG IN MY ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT THE USAGE OF THE DEFINITE ARTICLE UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES.


Jerk. I'm not trying to "talk above a level" I'm comfortable with.. I'm quite comfortable 'talking' at this 'level', thank you very much. I AM a terrible writer though, make no mistake about that. Knowing this, I really do TRY to understand how it's done as best I can. Hence my inability to give up on this until the Jedi's excellent explanation backed up by The CMS set me straight.


This is not even looking at your own puncutation mistakes.

Good. I will not look at yours either in that case. Shit, I'll even ignore the typo.


-----
GW: Tashen Boke [R/Me]; Rosti The Ninja [Mo/R]; Gort Grimley [W/Ne]
This comment was edited on Sep 18, 12:34.
-----
I'm not even angry. I'm being so sincere right now, even though you broke my heart and killed me.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
2.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
3.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
4.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
12.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
13.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
14.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
16.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
17.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
18.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
   "An" MMOG
19.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
    Re:
21.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
     Re:
22.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
      Re:
24.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
       Re:
25.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
       Re:
26.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
        Re:
27.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
         Re:
28.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
          Re:
23.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
      Re:
20.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
    Re: An
5.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
6.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
7.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
8.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
9.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
11.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
10.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
15.
Sep 17, 2005Sep 17 2005
29.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
30.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
 35.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
  Re: No subject
40.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
31.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
32.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
33.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
37.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
38.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
39.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
41.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
42.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
     Re: No subject
34.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
36.
Sep 18, 2005Sep 18 2005
43.
Sep 19, 2005Sep 19 2005