Retailers Appeal to Governorator

This open letter from the Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association (IEMA) has the trade organization's plea to California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger to terminate the recent bill that would fine retailers found guilty of selling violent games to minors (story). Here's a bit:
Re: Veto Request for A.B. 1179 (Yee)

Dear Governor Schwarzenegger,

The Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association (IEMA) is the non-profit trade organization representing the leading retailers of computer and video game products in the United States. IEMA member companies collectively account for almost 75% of the $10 billion annual games business in the U.S. The IEMA, and the retailers we represent in the State of California, respectfully urge you to veto A.B. 1179.

IEMA members take the issue of retailer enforcement of policies inhibiting the sale or rental of "Mature" rated games to minors very seriously; however, we do not believe that legislation is the answer. The IEMA believes that A.B. 1179 is unnecessary, as retailers are firmly committed to voluntarily enforcing and promoting the video game rating system. Second, legislation cannot and will not replace the ultimate role and responsibility of parents in their duty to raise their children, and this bill usurps the rights of parents by restricting minors' access to certain games, even if parents have approved them for their child. Further, federal courts have consistently recognized that video games are constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and the restrictions in this bill impermissibly run afoul of that protection. Finally, the bill provides no meaningful standards to assist in determining whether games would fall within the legislation's purview.
View : : :
28.
 
Inane
Sep 15, 2005, 12:20
28.
Inane Sep 15, 2005, 12:20
Sep 15, 2005, 12:20
 
It's completely inane, and utterly useless. The vast majority of video games played by kids are purchased by adults anyway, so even if there were a massive epidemic of 10 year olds playing San Andreas, this would do nothing to stop that.

Nor is there a massive epidemic of kids playing San Andreas, nor is there any casuality to show that even if there were a massive epidemic that it would seriously be a problem.

So in recap, this is legislation designed to stop something which isn't happening in an attempt to prevent something that probably wouldn't happen anyway.

I'm perfectly willing to believe that video games aren't the best thing in a kid's life. I'm willing to believe that for some kids, they're probably downright detrimental. But they aren't a health risk. Parents who ignore their kids are a health risk.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
2.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
3.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
4.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
5.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
6.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
7.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
8.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
10.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
11.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
19.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
     Re: bootleg it
22.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
      Re: bootleg it
23.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
       Re: bootleg it
24.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
        Re: bootleg it
25.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
         Re: bootleg it
26.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
          Re: bootleg it
27.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
           Re: bootleg it
30.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
            Re: bootleg it
9.
Sep 14, 2005Sep 14 2005
12.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
13.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
16.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
17.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
18.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
14.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
15.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
20.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
21.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
 28.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
Inane
29.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
31.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
32.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005
33.
Sep 15, 2005Sep 15 2005