UC: A World Apart Patch Glitch

3000AD sends along word on a glitch with the initial release of the version 1.00.03 auto-update for Universal Combat: A World Apart. Here's word on the problem, and the updated update, which does not iterate the game's version number:
Yesterday we released the v1.00.03 patch to the public via the in-game patch Updater. We have since discovered that an incorrect character asset was included in the original game distribution. This would cause one of the Instant Action scenarios (IA0113) which uses that asset, to fail upon loading.

To this end, we have re-issued this patch today and corrected this problem.

For those who have not yet updated their version, running the in-game Updater will download the new version.

For those who have already updated their version, the steps described in the v1.00.03 section of the recently updated version control file show how to force the Updater to re-download and re-apply the patch.

We apologize for this error. Hope you are enjoying the game as much as we enjoyed developing it.
View : : :
63.
 
Re: No subject
Sep 1, 2005, 17:10
63.
Re: No subject Sep 1, 2005, 17:10
Sep 1, 2005, 17:10
 
Derek, quiet with your bile-spewing bullshit you fucking waste of human life. I needn't prove anything to worthless sacks of dog spit like yourself. Unfortunately for you, i don't even have to guess at the fact that you're not only a horrible game designer, but a talentless hack of a programmer as well. That's all easily provable. I could go on and on about your lies and excuses -- which isn't libel by the way, because it's true, you crapbucket -- but they're already covered extensively by certain webpages that luckily show up before your own in google.

Your games are a fucking travesty. You already got a few dozen dollars of mine back at the BC3K release, so that easily earns me the right to piss in your mouth and kill your first born -- you should be so lucky that all i'm doing here is calling you on your fucking pathological bullshit.

Not only that, you can tell from his posts that he doesn't have *one* iota of talent whatsoever.

You'd like that to be true i'm sure, but luckily for both you and me, posts in a message board don't determine talent. Who's being libelous now, you shitstain on the underwear of life? If we applied your forum-based talent-judging method to yourself, you'd be so fucking far down the scale, they'd have to rewrite the evolutional timeline to include a new species between monkey and human. There's already more fucking talent in the pus contained by the mountain range of pimples on your bulging, disgusting forehead, but hey, why stop now?

Don't you ever, EVER fucking tell me about character assassination. You're a goddamn hypocrite. You came in here a couple weeks back and told someone they're a poster boy for abortion -- that's not character assassination? Do i even need to bring up your ever-so-friendly usenet posts? Right, you spluttering, bug-eyed degenerate.

I could tell you all about how i spent 36 hours this week doing a 1.2mil triangle character model for a normal map, and go into the nuances of using zbrush for detail, or how much of a pain in the ass it is that i have to invert the green channel after generating the map in Melody, but you really don't give a shit whether i'm actually an artist, do you? You just want to attack me. You'll find any way to do so, and it's just so much more convenient to deflect the focus from what i'm actually saying and put it on the fact that i'm saying it anonymously. I used to hear that you were one of the best flame warriors, but now that i've experienced the real thing, i'd have to say that you're not. You're pathetic. A whiny, lost little dog missing a leg and an eye, grasping desperately for any possible way to hold on to your pride and save face in front of your googly-eyed drones. You're a fucking choir boy compared to me, a fucking choir boy!

Fuck you, Derek Smart.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
2.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
3.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
4.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
5.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
6.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
     Re: No subject
7.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
      Re: No subject
8.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
      Re: No subject
9.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
       Re: No subject
10.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
        Re: No subject
11.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
         Re: No subject
13.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
          Re: No subject
14.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
           Re: No subject
15.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
            Re: No subject
12.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
         Re: No subject
69.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
      Re: No subject
22.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
23.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
70.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
16.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
18.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
32.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
34.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
35.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
37.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
     Re: No subject
39.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
      Re: No subject
40.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
       Re: No subject
41.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
        Re: No subject
42.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
         Re: No subject
66.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
        Re: No subject
17.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
19.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
20.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
21.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
24.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
25.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
26.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
27.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
28.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
29.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
     Re: No Subject
30.
Aug 31, 2005Aug 31 2005
      Re: No Subject
31.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
       Re: No Subject
33.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
        Re: No Subject
36.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
47.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
48.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
43.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
44.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
38.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
45.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
46.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
49.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
50.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
52.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
53.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
54.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
55.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
56.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
51.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
57.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
58.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
  Gimp
59.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
60.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
61.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
62.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
64.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
     Re: No subject
65.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
      Re: No subject
67.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
       Re: No subject
72.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
      Re: No subject
 63.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
    Re: No subject
71.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005
68.
Sep 1, 2005Sep 1 2005