Thompson Watch™

Jack Thompson Tried To Arrest My Boss on Game Revolution has a little follow-up on the controversial attorney's recent claim that he's received death threats (story), pointing out the AIM Icon that apparently comprises one of these threats. Thanks Frans.
View : : :
27.
 
Re: No subject
Aug 16, 2005, 20:41
27.
Re: No subject Aug 16, 2005, 20:41
Aug 16, 2005, 20:41
 
Yeah yeah, like I said, both parties love censorship. Now, I'm a flaming liberal myself, but really all I am is a person who can read the consitution. Whether or not the founding fathers could actually live up to what they wrote, they wrote it, and it's the foundation of this country. Were some of those rights just for show? I don't know. All I know is they're right there in black and white, so that's what I have to work with. I used to think that made me a conservative, but as it turns out I'm not.

I understood from Warhark's post that on issue's on censorship, O'Reilly would oppose the moral majority (TM) and go the traditional conservative route. That is also, however, why I said he wouldn't be able to do it, he'd alienate too much of his neocon fan-base.

Face the facts: Democrats love censorship. Republicans love censorship. China loves censorship. The USSR loved censorship. If a person can gain or hold a power by supporting censorship, they will probably support censorship.

Vote Sharpton.
This comment was edited on Aug 16, 20:41.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
2.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
3.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
4.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
5.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
6.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
7.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
9.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
8.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
11.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
12.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
13.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
16.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
10.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
14.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
15.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
17.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
18.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
30.
Aug 17, 2005Aug 17 2005
19.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
20.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
21.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
22.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
26.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
 27.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
  Re: No subject
28.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
23.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
24.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005
29.
Aug 17, 2005Aug 17 2005
25.
Aug 16, 2005Aug 16 2005