Sims 2 Backlash Backlash

Electronic Arts Slams Sims 2 Paedophile Claims on SPOnG.com (thanks Mike Martinez) has the response from EA about recent claims (story) of improper content in The Sims 2:
“This is nonsense,” said Jeff Brown, spokesman for EA. “Reasonable people understand there is nothing improper in the game. Reasonable people recognise what mods are. A consumer who chooses to use a mod does so without any kind of agreement with the company. There is no nudity. There is nothing improper or vulgar in the Sims 2.”

Brown continued, “Reasonable people understand the San Jose Mercury News is not responsible for vulgar things that people doodle into the margins of the paper.”
View : : :
67.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 28, 2005, 17:55
Prez
 
67.
Re: No subject Jul 28, 2005, 17:55
Jul 28, 2005, 17:55
 Prez
 
Like it or not, EA is on OUR side in this. They are one of the few companies that have the financial means of fighting the FTC and federal crusaders gunning for our hobby. I don't like their business policies, but I'm behind them on this one.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.”
- Mahatma Gandhi
Avatar 17185
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
3.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
7.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
2.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
4.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
5.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
6.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
8.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
9.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
16.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
10.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
11.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
12.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
13.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
14.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
15.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
17.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
18.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
20.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
21.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
22.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
26.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
23.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
44.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
45.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
46.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
     Re: No subject
49.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
      Re: No subject
50.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
       Re: No subject
51.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
       Re: No subject
53.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
        Re: No subject
59.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
       Re: No subject
48.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
52.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
     Re: No subject
55.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
      Re: No subject
54.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
     Re: No subject
56.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
      Re: No subject
57.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
       Re: No subject
63.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
19.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
24.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
25.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
27.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
29.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
31.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
32.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
33.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
38.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
39.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
40.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
66.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
77.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
84.
Jul 29, 2005Jul 29 2005
41.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
28.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
30.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
34.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
36.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
37.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
47.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
35.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
42.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
43.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
58.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
60.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
61.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
62.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
64.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
65.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
 67.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
  Re: No subject
68.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
69.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
70.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
71.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
82.
Jul 29, 2005Jul 29 2005
72.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
73.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
74.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
78.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
79.
Jul 29, 2005Jul 29 2005
80.
Jul 29, 2005Jul 29 2005
81.
Jul 29, 2005Jul 29 2005
83.
Jul 29, 2005Jul 29 2005
85.
Jul 31, 2005Jul 31 2005
75.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005
76.
Jul 28, 2005Jul 28 2005