B&W2 Demo & Retail Release Dates

Computer and Video Games comes away from a recent EA press event with word from Lionhead's Peter Molyneux on plans for the release date for Black & White 2, along with word to expect a one or two level playable demo of Lionhead's upcoming god game sequel either simultaneous with, or even prior to, the game's launch on either September 27 or October 14. They also say press builds of the beta version will be going out soon, so you can expect a preview or ten before too long. Here's a bit more on those "alternate" release dates, which are referred to as "concrete," in spite of the numerous delays to the original B&W:
Molyneux also went on to reveal two concrete release dates for B&W2 with 27 Sept or 14 October now apparently the two alternatives inked in for firm release. Molyneux said that producing the game for the September date would be "quite tight, but possible", although October 14 would seem more likely.
View : : :
26.
 
Re: No subject
Jul 18, 2005, 14:38
26.
Re: No subject Jul 18, 2005, 14:38
Jul 18, 2005, 14:38
 
I believe Electronic Arts own the Dungeon Keeper rights now (after buying out Bullfrog in '95), so I don't think Molyneaux can do anything with that franchise anymore.

At Hot Summer Night Peter told that he loved to do another Dungeon Siege, but that it was up to EA to decide. So if EA wants so, I think Lionhead will be the one to make it. B&W 2 is published by EA, so I guess they've still got a good relationship.

What i've seen from B&W it looks incredible. It's to be seen how the gameplay turns out, but it looks like it's going to be what the first one should have been.

People who criticize Molyneux don't know how important he's been for the gamesindustry and how important it is that there are still people trying to do something new and origininal - which is harder to succeed in than making another clone.

This comment was edited on Jul 18, 14:39.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
2.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
3.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
4.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
6.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
9.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
 26.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
    Re: No subject
5.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
7.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
8.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
14.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
15.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
17.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
   Re: Well
19.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
    Re: Well
21.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
     Re: Well
22.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
      Re: Well
23.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
       Re: Well
20.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
    Re: Well
18.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
38.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
   Re: Well
39.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
    Re: Well
48.
Jul 19, 2005Jul 19 2005
     Re: Well
34.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
10.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
11.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
12.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
16.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
25.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
27.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
29.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
30.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
     Re: No subject
32.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
     Re: No subject
33.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
40.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
41.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
42.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
43.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
31.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
13.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
24.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
28.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
35.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
36.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
37.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
44.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
45.
Jul 18, 2005Jul 18 2005
46.
Jul 19, 2005Jul 19 2005
47.
Jul 19, 2005Jul 19 2005