Out of the Blue

I got my first taste yesterday of a BF2 bug I'd heard complaints about, but had not previously experienced. After a firefight I noticed a teamkill message, so I said I was sorry. A few minutes later it happened again, and when it happened a third time, I was positive there were no friendlies in my sights, and I also noticed a team message asking 'why is everyone shooting me?' The thing is, the team message was in red, just like the name over this guy... he was showing up as an enemy. Looking at the scoreboard, I saw myself with a score of negative-11 and a bunch of teammates in the minus column as well. In spite of people repeatedly messaging him that he was mysteriously appearing as an enemy, he was relentlessly punishing every TK. So instead of leaving the server himself, he just forced myself and his other teammates to leave instead. I would gladly give up the whole TK punish function, which may as well default to punish for all the understanding shown in its use, in exchange for a working voting system, as I have never actually seen a successful mutiny or player kick vote.

Punishing Links! Thanks Mike Martinez, Ant, and EvilToast.
Links: Brandon-Bird-O-Rama.
'Bullitt' car chase still tops in Hollywood. Thanks Eye 4N Eye.
Stories: Europe to fall silent for UK bomb victims.
Woman gets $74,000 water bill.
Book stores brace for record Harry Potter rush.
Science! Group Calls for Soft Drink Warnings (registration required).
Newly discovered planet has 3 suns. Thanks Jim. Here's the story, of a planet named Brady!
Media: NiN Video.
Gross coin trick.
Follow-ups: Discovery Launch a No-Go.
Teh Funny: VG Cats.
View : : :
20.
 
Re: AMD suit dismissed as 'media campaig
Jul 14, 2005, 13:09
20.
Re: AMD suit dismissed as 'media campaig Jul 14, 2005, 13:09
Jul 14, 2005, 13:09
 
And there little stunt failed. Why AMD?

Their. Ye gods.

And how are you classifying "failed" today Tim? Your topic is misleading, as is your text. The suit has not been dismissed. It's not likely to be resolved in this decade, but it's not going to be so handily dismissed either. Not when there's some pretty damning evidence against Intel.

Not that you'll listen. You're nothing more than an Intel fanboy, and a troll to boot. Shoo.

And to anyone else -- if you want the evidence, I'll happily explain it to you. But not to Tim, who has proven repeatedly that he'll ignore evidence that doesn't support his delusions regarding Intel and Rambus.

Oh, and I own both Intel and AMD stock, as well as computers based on both technologies.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
2.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
3.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
6.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
9.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
10.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
11.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
12.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
36.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
7.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
13.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
27.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
4.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
21.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
5.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
8.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
14.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
15.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
17.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
16.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
26.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
29.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
30.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
   Re: Ronin
31.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
    Re: Ronin
33.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
     Re: Ronin
52.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
     Re: Ronin
56.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
      Re: Ronin
64.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
       Re: Ronin
32.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
    Re: Ronin
69.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
     Re: Ronin
70.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
      Dance of Death
71.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
      Re: Ronin
73.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
      Re: Ronin
84.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
      Re: Ronin
18.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
19.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
 20.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
 Re: AMD suit dismissed as 'media campaig
22.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
23.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
24.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
25.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
40.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
46.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
60.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
61.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
62.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
63.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
65.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
66.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
67.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
75.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
28.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
34.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
35.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
37.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
38.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
39.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
49.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
54.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
59.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
68.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
72.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
74.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
78.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
55.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
58.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
41.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
42.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
43.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
45.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
48.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
50.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
51.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
53.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
57.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
44.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
47.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
82.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
83.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
76.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
77.
Jul 14, 2005Jul 14 2005
79.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
80.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
81.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
85.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
86.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
87.
Jul 15, 2005Jul 15 2005
     Re: No subject
88.
Jul 16, 2005Jul 16 2005