Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
User Settings
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:
Germany 08/31
Chicago, IL USA, IL 10/19

Regularly scheduled events

BF2 Stats Viewer

Battlefield Nation now offers downloads of a proof-of-concept CGI script to allow Battlefield 2 players to view their stats from ranked servers bypassing the BFHQ interface. The source code for the script is available publicly under the MIT license.

25. Re: Stats Jun 27, 2005, 17:51 Chris
And how are points determined? Why by a direct relationship to kills!

As has already been pointed out several times in this thread alone, no, points are determined by many actions *one of which* is kills. So, no, there is no "direct relationship" between kills and points: you could score lots of points without ever making a single kill, to take an extreme counterexample.

Then go read how rankings are done for any of the Unreal Tournament games, for World of Warcraft's honor system (which is far from perfect, since there's no dishonor), or numerous other games (including open source ones). It's not hard. Consider each death event a one-on-one tournament

So your solution to (your imagined problem that) points are only given for kills is to implement a system which only works for kills? The BF2 system rewards players for many actions besides kills; again, I don't see how this system could be integrated with chess-like rankings.

Who's the better player? One who kills 100 newbies in the space of 4 hours and dies 200 times, or one that kills 50 decent players in 2 hours and dies 5 times? Right now there's no scoring difference -- they both get the exact same number of points.

There is no way of knowing who the better player is in the situation you describe because -- in case this hasn't been said before -- rewards in BF2 AREN'T JUST BASED ON KILLS AND DEATHS. Go play Quake 3 if you want such a game.

It would be trivial to adjust the current system to reflect time played, such as using points-per-minute rather than just points. I, for one, am happy they didn't go that route.

Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 27, 12:17 Nifty Zathrus
  2. Jun 27, 12:35  Re: Nifty DDI
  3. Jun 27, 12:44 Stats are great.... Retired
  4. Jun 27, 12:47  Re: Stats are great.... Zathrus
  5. Jun 27, 12:50   Re: Stats are great.... Retired
  8. Jun 27, 13:29  Re: Stats are great.... Skoll
  9. Jun 27, 13:42   Stats Tumbler
  12. Jun 27, 13:47    Re: Stats sponge
  13. Jun 27, 13:55     Re: Stats DDI
  14. Jun 27, 14:09      Re: Stats Chris
  16. Jun 27, 14:38       Re: Stats Zathrus
  19. Jun 27, 15:06        Re: Stats mittens
  20. Jun 27, 15:53         Re: Stats Quan
  21. Jun 27, 16:03          Re: Stats Zathrus
>> 25. Jun 27, 17:51        Re: Stats Chris
  26. Jun 28, 01:11         Re: Stats Skoll
  24. Jun 27, 16:44       Re: Stats Tumbler
  10. Jun 27, 13:46   Re: Stats are great.... Zathrus
  17. Jun 27, 14:53    Re: Stats are great.... Mega Fantasy Sci-Fi PostApocalyptic MMORTRPFPS 9000
  23. Jun 27, 16:12     Re: Stats are great.... DDI
  15. Jun 27, 14:33  Re: Stats are great.... Kxmode
  6. Jun 27, 12:55 MORE AND BETTER STATS! Retired
  7. Jun 27, 12:56 No subject space captain
  11. Jun 27, 13:46 No subject Retired
  18. Jun 27, 14:59 No subject Retired
  22. Jun 27, 16:10  Re: No subject DDI


Blue's News logo