Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 2

EA and Digital Illusions Assault Store Shelves with Battlefield 2 for the PC announces that DICE's shooter sequel is beginning to deploy:
REDWOOD CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 21, 2005--Get to the chopper! Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: ERTS - News) and Digital Illusions today announced that Battlefield 2(TM) has begun to ship to retail outlets for the PC. Powered by an all new game engine, Battlefield 2 brings the intensity and excitement of its predecessors, the award-winning Battlefield 1942(TM) and Battlefield Vietnam(TM), into the modern era with the latest, most technologically advanced vehicles and weapons systems available to man.

In Battlefield 2, players will choose to fight for one of three military superpowers: the United States, China, or the newly formed Middle East Coalition. Armed with the latest modern weaponry, players can take control of any of the game's 30+ vehicles. Players can also hone their skills against improved enemy intelligence in the new single-player campaign before competing online with up to 64 players in some of the most intense battles on the PC.
View : : :
122.
 
Ranked
Jun 25, 2005, 02:23
Ranked Jun 25, 2005, 02:23
Jun 25, 2005, 02:23
 
Earlier this month EA released news about "Ranked Servers"

"Ranked servers will be where the hardcore bump heads and clash knives. All Ranked Servers will be configured to provide the definitive competitive Battlefield experience."

"Ranked servers will be heavily administrated and have Punkbuster on. The integrity of the stats system is of paramount importance to EA (and of course to those participating in it) and so we will be monitoring things constantly. At the end of the day, Ranked servers will be a safe, regulated environment on which the most competitive players will be spending their time. If this environment doesn’t sound right for you, that’s great. That’s what Unranked servers are for."

That sounded like it made some sense... and they continue....:

"Unranked Servers
These servers are the wild cards – every one will be different, set to suit a specific part of our community (that part can be an individual player turned server operator, whole clans or even fan websites). The one thing these will all have in common, however, is the lack of pressure to meet the high standard of play we will expect on Ranked servers (i.e. don’t be a nuisance, don’t break EA’s Terms and Conditions and strive to be a team player)."


I have waited with every other BF guy to get this new game and have some excitement again, just like DC did for BF1942. But! Do you remember playing Battlefield 1942 or Battlefield Vietnam and remember thinking that your scores didn’t matter because EA was watching over them? Me neither. It seems EA with these statements is openly implying, if not admitting they think those of us who are more likely play mostly on "Unranked" servers are the less competitive or "hardcore" gamers than those that play ranked servers. In both of the games we have been playing for years you go to clan servers for the best games and you go to the EA servers if you are an a lost noob or you just want to feel better about yourself and waste a dozen or two of them. Why are they really doing this??? I predict that the EA “Ranked” servers are going to get all the guys that have only mastered the Cobra or gunships, that have small wood, and point to their individual scores for validation. Actually, if we could banish all the players like that to EA servers…


If you find your self, like I do, migrating to clan servers because your favorite mods is there and EA doesn’t play those, and the competitions are more challenging there, and the noobs are either getting trained or getting killed in a hurry there. We are the players that made the Battlefield series the success that it is today! Why are they isolating us? They give some sort of cooler UNLOCKABLE WEAPONS to those that decide to play on EA servers?

I hope the open source movement of some kick ass mod developers wins out over this,


Can’t Sleep

b3ak3r
http://www.firescore.com


Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
14.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
17.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
19.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
38.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
    Re: Uh Oh
20.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
22.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
    Re: Uh Oh
24.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: Uh Oh
25.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
      Re: Uh Oh
26.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
       BF2
28.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
        Re: BF2
36.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
         Re: BF2
43.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
       Re: Uh Oh
44.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
        Re: Uh Oh
30.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
      Re: Uh Oh
60.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
       Re: Uh Oh
33.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
      Re: Uh Oh
31.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: Uh Oh
39.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
106.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
109.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
    Re: Uh Oh
112.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
     Re: Uh Oh
65.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
15.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
42.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
27.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
29.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
32.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
2.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
3.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
4.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
6.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
7.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
5.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
18.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
8.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
9.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
10.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
11.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
12.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
13.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
34.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
35.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
57.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
16.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
21.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
23.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
37.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
40.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
53.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
84.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
91.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
92.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
93.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: No subject
98.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
68.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
46.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
45.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
47.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
48.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
49.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
75.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
77.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
50.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
51.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
52.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
54.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
66.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
74.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
94.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
95.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
55.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
56.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
58.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
59.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
61.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
62.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
63.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
64.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
67.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
70.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
71.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
73.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
76.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: Any sales?
69.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
72.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
85.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
86.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
78.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
79.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
80.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
82.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
81.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
83.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
96.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
97.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
99.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
100.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
101.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
102.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
103.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
     Re: no thanks
110.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
111.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
119.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
107.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
108.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
113.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
114.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
115.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
116.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
     Re: no thanks
117.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
      Re: no thanks
118.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
       Re: no thanks
120.
Jun 23, 2005Jun 23 2005
     Re: no thanks
87.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
88.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
89.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
90.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
104.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
105.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
121.
Jun 23, 2005Jun 23 2005
 122.
Jun 25, 2005Jun 25 2005
 Ranked