Ships Ahoy - Battlefield 2

EA and Digital Illusions Assault Store Shelves with Battlefield 2 for the PC announces that DICE's shooter sequel is beginning to deploy:
REDWOOD CITY, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 21, 2005--Get to the chopper! Electronic Arts (NASDAQ: ERTS - News) and Digital Illusions today announced that Battlefield 2(TM) has begun to ship to retail outlets for the PC. Powered by an all new game engine, Battlefield 2 brings the intensity and excitement of its predecessors, the award-winning Battlefield 1942(TM) and Battlefield Vietnam(TM), into the modern era with the latest, most technologically advanced vehicles and weapons systems available to man.

In Battlefield 2, players will choose to fight for one of three military superpowers: the United States, China, or the newly formed Middle East Coalition. Armed with the latest modern weaponry, players can take control of any of the game's 30+ vehicles. Players can also hone their skills against improved enemy intelligence in the new single-player campaign before competing online with up to 64 players in some of the most intense battles on the PC.
View : : :
17.
 
Re: Uh Oh
Jun 21, 2005, 10:43
17.
Re: Uh Oh Jun 21, 2005, 10:43
Jun 21, 2005, 10:43
 
Quake x, RoTT, MoH:AA, UT, BF1942, CoD, RTCW, DoD, or whatever else you've played. But once I get sick of a game, there's no going back

I thought it was the same for me, but after giving up CS back in like 2000 I returned to CS:S this year. 4 or 5 years between and a new engine, but identical gameplay and idiots.

That is the problem, though. I am very sick of BF2 after playing the demo for a week or so. Won't buy the game based on that, I know I'm just very tired of it. A large part of that comes from infantry feeling useless and slow. Didn't appeal to me.


I'm probably jaded because I'm tired of it, but I'm surprised to see it getting such high reviews. It seems like no one is ever willing to fault the high-profile games in major reviews. Maybe I'm the only one that thinks this game isn't a 9.5, but San Andreas doesn't deserve the praise, considering it adds nothing useful to Vice City, only a bunch of mindless chores like working out. Doom 3 certainly didn't deserve the ultra-high scores it got when it was first released. HL2 was the best of the bunch, but some reviewers put it better than HL. And, jumping on a common theme around here, Far Cry was a lower profile release and got lesser reviews when released, but beats all the above games and holds its own against HL2...

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
14.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
 17.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
  Re: Uh Oh
19.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
38.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
    Re: Uh Oh
20.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
22.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
    Re: Uh Oh
24.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: Uh Oh
25.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
      Re: Uh Oh
26.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
       BF2
28.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
        Re: BF2
36.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
         Re: BF2
43.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
       Re: Uh Oh
44.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
        Re: Uh Oh
30.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
      Re: Uh Oh
60.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
       Re: Uh Oh
33.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
      Re: Uh Oh
31.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: Uh Oh
39.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
106.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
   Re: Uh Oh
109.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
    Re: Uh Oh
112.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
     Re: Uh Oh
65.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
15.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
42.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
27.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
29.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
32.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
2.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
3.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
4.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
6.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
7.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
5.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
18.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
8.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
9.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
10.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
11.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
12.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
13.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
34.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
35.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
57.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
16.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
21.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
23.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
37.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
40.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
53.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
84.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
91.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
92.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
93.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: No subject
98.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
68.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
46.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
45.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
47.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
48.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
49.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
75.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
77.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
50.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
51.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
52.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
54.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
66.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
74.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
94.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
95.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
55.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
56.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
58.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
59.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
61.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
62.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
63.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
64.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
67.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
70.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
71.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
73.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
76.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
     Re: Any sales?
69.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
72.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
85.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
86.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
78.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
79.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
80.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
82.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
81.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
83.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
96.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
97.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
99.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
100.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
101.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
102.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
103.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
     Re: no thanks
110.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
111.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
119.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
107.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
108.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
113.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
114.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
115.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
116.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
     Re: no thanks
117.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
      Re: no thanks
118.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
       Re: no thanks
120.
Jun 23, 2005Jun 23 2005
     Re: no thanks
87.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
88.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
89.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
90.
Jun 21, 2005Jun 21 2005
104.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
105.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
121.
Jun 23, 2005Jun 23 2005
122.
Jun 25, 2005Jun 25 2005