Send News. Want a reply? Read this. More in the FAQ.   News Forum - All Forums - Mobile - PDA - RSS Headlines  RSS Headlines   Twitter  Twitter
Customize
User Settings
Styles:
LAN Parties
Upcoming one-time events:

Regularly scheduled events

Ritual Countdown, Testing Program, Sin II Tease?

The Ritual Entertainment Website now offers a redirect to this teaser page that seems to be a countdown of some sort, as the page currently sports a ginormous 18. Proceeding through to the main page reveals that the tribe is also launching a playtester program open to those 18 years or older in the Dallas, TX area willing to come in and contribute opinions about their works-in-progress. Finally, on another possibly related note, both http://www.ritual.com/sin2/ and http://www.sin2.com/ now redirect to LegionPharma, a site that looks like a legit drug company, though researching that trademark suggests this is fictitious, so this could be some sort of viral marketing for a still-unannounced Sin sequel. Thanks Frans.

View
80. Re: No subject Jun 18, 2005, 05:26 Riley Pizt
 
Yeah jackass, just what this industry needs, the government to design some f*cked up regulations which only make money for lawyers.
Yes, that's right. Consumer protection laws only enrich lawyers. No consumer has ever benefitted from such legislation. LOL!

If you could design the laws, what standard would you use?...
It need not be that complicated. Simply treat software sold (licensed) to consumers as a standard consumer product with the normal liabilities of such a product and not some rented service which exonerates the purveyor of all responsibility if the software doesn't perform as it should or as advertised.

The consumer and the developers would get fucked.
The consumer would be in a much better situation than he is in right now because right now he is totally fucked. Developers would have to stop abrogating their responsibilities to develop a quality product.

Defective toys that can hurt childeren are recalled, but just because a toy sucks ass and your kid hates it, doesn't mean you can sue.
Actually in America you can sue.

And millions of toys break while kids are playing with them, should we clog the courts even further every time a kid drops and breaks a toy?
Of course not, but if the toy was made of substandard or defective materials, the manufacturer is liable and is responsible for repair or replacement.

If you're worried about compatibility or performance, wait for the demo. You can wait can't you?
A demo does not show and tell all about the shipping version of game, nor do all games have demos. Bugs and defects exist in full versions of some games but not in the demo versions because the content is different.

If you want to find out about the game, use the internet.
That is not a substitute for the publisher's responsibility to deliver a quality product which performs as advertised or expected. No game review tells all, and even if it is unbiased, it is still just a single opinion and most importantly, it is NOT the consumer's own opinion.

There are tons of laws which can protect consumers. The EULA doesn't protect the industry from most of them.
Actually both UCITA (in the states where it is law) and current case law regarding EULA's do protect the industry from them.

And it wouldn't take much of an effort for a lawyer to negate the whole thing. Contract by both sides? And for precedent, a few months back, a judge ruled the an internet company was not held liable for a violation of privacy statement set forth in their little click through. They argued and the judge agreed that no one reads the contracts and therefore they couldn't hold the company responsible for what they said in the clickthrough.
The difference though is that is a privacy agreement not a software license agreement.

Opening shrinkwrap is not signing a contract.
Unfortunately courts have ruled that it is. The current ruling in the Blizzard/Vivendi versus BnetD case says just that.

This comment was edited on Jun 18, 06:04.
 
Previous Post Next Post Reply Quote Edit Delete Report
 
    Date Subject Author
  1. Jun 17, 10:37 No subject waxthirteen
  2. Jun 17, 10:38  Re: No subject Hunterzyph
  28. Jun 17, 13:28   SIN 2!! Fantaz
  3. Jun 17, 10:41  Re: No subject MyRealName
  4. Jun 17, 10:58   Re: No subject aldo_14
  5. Jun 17, 11:06    Re: No subject MyRealName
  6. Jun 17, 11:08     Re: No subject nin
  7. Jun 17, 11:12      Re: No subject  RomSteady 
  9. Jun 17, 11:17       Re: No subject MyRealName
  10. Jun 17, 11:25        Re: No subject Grumpy Sod
  13. Jun 17, 11:35         Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  18. Jun 17, 12:21          Re: No subject Kix
  19. Jun 17, 12:29           Re: No subject Beamer
  11. Jun 17, 11:27        Re: No subject  RomSteady 
  66. Jun 17, 19:04         Re: No subject MyRealName
  65. Jun 17, 18:13        Re: No subject aldo_14
  12. Jun 17, 11:30    Re: No subject XEON
  14. Jun 17, 11:42     Re: No subject BicycleRepairMan
  15. Jun 17, 12:05      Re: No subject Overon
  16. Jun 17, 12:06      Re: No subject XEON
  17. Jun 17, 12:09      Re: No subject Beamer
  33. Jun 17, 14:42       Re: No subject Beamer
  35. Jun 17, 15:00        Re: No subject cyxxon
  67. Jun 17, 19:28       Re: No subject Aardvarkm
  20. Jun 17, 12:41      Re: No subject mystery8
  21. Jun 17, 12:49       Re: No subject Beamer
  22. Jun 17, 12:52    Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  32. Jun 17, 14:19   Re: No subject Dentrassi
  34. Jun 17, 14:54    Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  37. Jun 17, 15:25     Re: No subject Xenos Overdrive
  40. Jun 17, 15:33      Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  46. Jun 17, 15:52       Re: No subject Xenos Overdrive
  47. Jun 17, 15:56        Re: No subject The Half Elf
  61. Jun 17, 17:45        Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  68. Jun 17, 20:03       Re: No subject Fantaz
  69. Jun 17, 20:08        Re: No subject  RomSteady 
  70. Jun 17, 20:47         Re: No subject The Truth
  71. Jun 17, 20:57          Re: No subject Fantaz
  72. Jun 17, 21:05           Re: No subject aldo_14
  73. Jun 17, 22:42            Re: No subject beaves
  74. Jun 18, 00:48           Re: No subject Beerninja
  83. Jun 18, 07:40         Re: No subject JeZZyBaLL
  84. Jun 18, 10:06          Re: No subject The Half Elf
  85. Jun 18, 10:33           Re: No subject Enahs
  48. Jun 17, 16:18     Re: No subject sinner's saint
  49. Jun 17, 16:28      Re: No subject Xenopulse
  56. Jun 17, 17:18       Re: No subject sinner's saint
  64. Jun 17, 18:01        Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  75. Jun 18, 01:04         Re: No subject .Drifter
  78. Jun 18, 03:57         Re: No subject LwoodPDowd
>> 80. Jun 18, 05:26          Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  53. Jun 17, 17:04      Re: No subject The Truth
  63. Jun 17, 17:52       Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  62. Jun 17, 17:50      Re: No subject Riley Pizt
  60. Jun 17, 17:40  Re: No subject Kiltron
  8. Jun 17, 11:14 As If... venomhed
  23. Jun 17, 12:58 It's fake. Riley Pizt
  24. Jun 17, 13:05  Re: It's fake. MMORPGHoD
  26. Jun 17, 13:17   Re: It's fake. Reactor
  27. Jun 17, 13:21    Re: It's fake. Sho
  29. Jun 17, 13:29     Re: It's fake. Reactor
  30. Jun 17, 13:39     Re: It's fake. MMORPGHoD
  31. Jun 17, 14:17      Re: It's fake. Hump
  25. Jun 17, 13:16 No subject ExcessDan
  36. Jun 17, 15:06 No subject space captain
  38. Jun 17, 15:26  Re: No subject Jaenos
  41. Jun 17, 15:33  Re: No subject Tetrad
  42. Jun 17, 15:39   Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  43. Jun 17, 15:42    Re: No subject The Half Elf
  45. Jun 17, 15:45     Re: No subject MMORPGHoD
  52. Jun 17, 16:47   Re: No subject space captain
  39. Jun 17, 15:32 No subject WarPig
  44. Jun 17, 15:44 Shit Creston
  76. Jun 18, 02:41  Re: Shit onethumb
  77. Jun 18, 02:57   Re: Shit Reactor
  79. Jun 18, 04:05   Re: Shit LwoodPDowd
  81. Jun 18, 05:33    Re: Shit Riley Pizt
  82. Jun 18, 05:44   Re: Shit Riley Pizt
  86. Jun 18, 12:40    Re: Shit Xenos Overdrive
  87. Jun 18, 13:29     Re: Shit BrushBaron
  88. Jun 19, 02:05      Re: Shit Prez
  90. Jun 19, 08:38       Re: Shit JeZZyBaLL
  92. Jun 19, 11:33        Re: Shit JeZZyBaLL
  93. Jun 19, 15:04         Re: Shit Sho
  94. Jun 19, 18:48          Re: Shit Fantaz
  95. Jun 19, 20:23           Re: Shit nin
  91. Jun 19, 09:51       Re: Shit Kiltron
  96. Jun 20, 09:17   Re: Shit Creston
  97. Jun 20, 12:09    Re: Shit Prez
  98. Jun 20, 12:29     Re: Shit Fantaz
  99. Jun 20, 12:37      Re: Shit Prez
  100. Jun 20, 13:46      Re: Shit Creston
  101. Jun 22, 13:17       Re: Shit Hot Gaming Girls b3ak3r
  102. Jun 22, 18:41        Re: Shit Hot Gaming Girls Halo
  103. Jun 22, 21:45         Re: Shit Hot Gaming Girls Prez
  104. Jun 23, 08:53        Re: Shit Hot Gaming Girls Tango
  50. Jun 17, 16:33 They must be fake (LegionPharma) Rhomboid
  55. Jun 17, 17:11  Re: They must be fake (LegionPharma) MindTrigger
  57. Jun 17, 17:21   Re: They must be fake (LegionPharma) ZipFlap
  58. Jun 17, 17:26    Re: They must be fake (LegionPharma) MindTrigger
  59. Jun 17, 17:29     Re: They must be fake (LegionPharma) MindTrigger
  51. Jun 17, 16:45 No subject Tim
  54. Jun 17, 17:11 No subject space captain
  89. Jun 19, 08:38 No subject Sho


footer

Blue's News logo