Ritual Countdown, Testing Program, Sin II Tease?

The Ritual Entertainment Website now offers a redirect to this teaser page that seems to be a countdown of some sort, as the page currently sports a ginormous 18. Proceeding through to the main page reveals that the tribe is also launching a playtester program open to those 18 years or older in the Dallas, TX area willing to come in and contribute opinions about their works-in-progress. Finally, on another possibly related note, both http://www.ritual.com/sin2/ and http://www.sin2.com/ now redirect to LegionPharma, a site that looks like a legit drug company, though researching that trademark suggests this is fictitious, so this could be some sort of viral marketing for a still-unannounced Sin sequel. Thanks Frans.
View : : :
53.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 17, 2005, 17:04
53.
Re: No subject Jun 17, 2005, 17:04
Jun 17, 2005, 17:04
 
You are the exact jackass that sues McDonalds because their coffee was too hot. Do us all a favor and slit your wrists. Buyer beware moron, read reviews before you buy games. I hate uninformed consumers, you ass tards deserve whatever misery you inflict on yourself for buying a product without fully investigating it. It takes 2 fucking minutes to look up a review online. Idiot.

Actually, I think your mentality is part of the low quality problem. A consumer should not have to read a review to identify wether there are any bugs in a game and how bad they are. What they should be able to do is read the provided materials and make an immediate (although limited) informed opinion as to wether this game is for them.

Example I walk into the store and pick up a game (Black and White) see that the rating is mature, see the computer requirements are acceptable and its a type of god game with cool looking creatures. That is an acceptable amount of information for me to make my decision and most if not all games carry it.

Now heres the issue with your line of thinking and why the majority of arguments for SUE THEM!/READ THE REVIEW etc are wrong.

When I get to level 5 I hit a bug, this bug is in fact so bad that I cannot physically complete the game, therefore I cannot use the product to its full extent, not due to lack of skill but to a physical problem that was allowed into the game. Now what happens when I attempt to return the game? Exactly im not allowed to.

I am not allowed to return faulty software for a full refund due to it being broken by the makers. This is the full problem. If consumers were allowed to return games that were broken developers would think twice about putting out games with bugs. If a game was marked as high quality visuals and it is infact not then the consumer could return it which in turn would hopefully create more demand for better quality games.

Sure this wouldent affect some games (HL2 etc) but for the majority of the crap out there the developers and publishers would get punished for releasing it.


I know this doesent apply in the UK and a few other places but the markets are not big enough for this policy to influence these changes, its only here in the US where its all jacked up...

just my 2cents.

------
$1 tax for the national debt?
------
Diablo & Diablo 2 for the DS, it makes sense Blizzard!
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
2.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
28.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
3.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
4.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
5.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
6.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
7.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
9.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
10.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
13.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
        Re: No subject
18.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
         Re: No subject
19.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
          Re: No subject
11.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
66.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
        Re: No subject
65.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
12.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
14.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
15.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
16.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
17.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
33.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
35.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
67.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
20.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
21.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
22.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
32.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
34.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
37.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
40.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
46.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
47.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
61.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
68.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
69.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
70.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
        Re: No subject
71.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
         Re: No subject
72.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
          Re: No subject
73.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
           Re: No subject
74.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
          Re: No subject
83.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
        Re: No subject
84.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
         Re: No subject
85.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
          Re: No subject
48.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
49.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
56.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
64.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
       Re: No subject
75.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
        Re: No subject
78.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
        Re: No subject
80.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
         Re: No subject
 53.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
63.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
      Re: No subject
62.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: No subject
60.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
8.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
23.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
24.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
26.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
27.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
29.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
30.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
31.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
     Re: It's fake.
25.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
36.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
38.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
41.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
42.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
43.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
45.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
52.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
39.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
44.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
76.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
77.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
79.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
81.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
   Re: Shit
82.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
86.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
   Re: Shit
87.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
    Re: Shit
88.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
     Re: Shit
90.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
      Re: Shit
92.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
       Re: Shit
93.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
        Re: Shit
94.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
         Re: Shit
95.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
          Re: Shit
91.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
      Re: Shit
96.
Jun 20, 2005Jun 20 2005
97.
Jun 20, 2005Jun 20 2005
   Re: Shit
98.
Jun 20, 2005Jun 20 2005
    Re: Shit
99.
Jun 20, 2005Jun 20 2005
     Re: Shit
100.
Jun 20, 2005Jun 20 2005
     Re: Shit
101.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
102.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
103.
Jun 22, 2005Jun 22 2005
104.
Jun 23, 2005Jun 23 2005
50.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
55.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
57.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
58.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
59.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
51.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
54.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
89.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005