Blizzard vs BnetD

Electronic Frontier Foundation (thanks Mike Martinez) outlines their perspective on the issues at stake on Monday when an appeals court takes on the case of Blizzard versus the creators of the BnetD Battle.Net emulator:
St. Louis, MO - On Monday, June 20, the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Blizzard v. BnetD, a case that could dramatically impact consumers' ability to customize software and electronic devices and to obtain customized tools created by others.

Along with co-counsel Paul Grewal of Day Casebeer, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is representing three open source software engineers who reverse-engineered an aspect of Blizzard's Battlenet game server in order to create a free software game server called BnetD that works with lawfully purchased Blizzard games. The BnetD server lets gamers have a wider range of options when playing online. The lower court held that the reverse-engineering of the games needed to create this new option for consumers was illegal.

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals will determine whether the three software programmers were in violation of the anticircumvention provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and Blizzard Games' end user license agreement (EULA). EFF will argue that the DMCA expressly protects the programming and distributing of programs such as BnetD and this protection cannot be undercut by general state contract law as applied to EULAs.

EFF took the case to stand up for consumer choice in the marketplace. Reverse engineering is often the only way to craft a new product that works with older ones. Congress expressly recognized this when it created an exception to the DMCA for reverse engineering. Whether it's allowing gamers to choose a better server for Internet play, or allowing a printer owner to purchase from a range of printer cartridge replacements, reverse engineering is a critical part of innovation in a world where more and more devices need to talk to each other in order to operate correctly.
View : : :
2.
 
Wait a second
Jun 17, 2005, 11:02
2.
Wait a second Jun 17, 2005, 11:02
Jun 17, 2005, 11:02
 
...Day Casebeer? Sounds dubious to me. Fun, but dubious.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
5.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
6.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
7.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
8.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
15.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
16.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
17.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
21.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
22.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
27.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
20.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
23.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
24.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
28.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
29.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
30.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
31.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005
          Re: Confusion in legislation
 2.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
Wait a second
3.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
4.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
9.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
10.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
18.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
11.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
12.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
13.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
19.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
25.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
26.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005
14.
Jun 17, 2005Jun 17 2005