Wow! 2M Playing WoW!

World of Warcraft Achieves New Milestone with Two Million Paying Subscribers is the press release announcing a new subscription threshold achieved by Blizzard's MMORPG, with further breakthroughs expected when the game launches in China:
World of Warcraft recently surpassed the two million mark for paying subscribers. Already the largest MMO in both North America and Europe, Blizzard expects to see even greater growth with the recent commercial launch in China on June 7, 2005. Anticipation for World of Warcraft was already at an all-time high in China, with peak concurrency during the open beta test topping 500,000 players, nearly equal to World of Warcraft's peak concurrency in all three current markets combined. Blizzard expects to see the new mark of two million subscribers shattered quickly with the arrival of players from China in the coming weeks.
View : : :
50.
 
Re: No subject
Jun 14, 2005, 17:28
50.
Re: No subject Jun 14, 2005, 17:28
Jun 14, 2005, 17:28
 
"I hear a lot of people saying that there is a definite item grind, though, that your survivability is massively dependant on your loot?
Granted, the people I hear this from may not be the most objective observers (ie, GW players)."

Remeber bunny hopping around in Counter Strike where you couldn't hit someone because your shots wouldn't land? Yeah? Well that's what good players do in WoW. You can have the most pimped out gear and I'll still bunny hop around instanting your ass to death. You can definitely tell the MMORPG addicts from the FPS fans when you start fighting. An MMORPG nerd will stand still exchanging blows. The FPS player will hop around like a crack addict so you can't keep targeted.

The gear only matters when you fight someone whose also a crack head (i.e. good at maneuvering). Then you're fucked.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
5.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
29.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
2.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
3.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
4.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
6.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
16.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
17.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
7.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
8.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
9.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
13.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
10.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
11.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
12.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
14.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
15.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
32.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
34.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
18.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
21.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
19.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
20.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
23.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
24.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
27.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
30.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
67.
Jun 15, 2005Jun 15 2005
33.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
22.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
25.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
26.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
28.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
31.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
36.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
37.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
51.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
52.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
     Re: No subject
38.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
54.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
43.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
44.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
46.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
47.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
58.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
     Re: No subject
64.
Jun 15, 2005Jun 15 2005
      Re: No subject
66.
Jun 15, 2005Jun 15 2005
       Re: No subject
45.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
48.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
49.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
 50.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
  Re: No subject
59.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
60.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
61.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
     Re: No subject
62.
Jun 15, 2005Jun 15 2005
      Re: No subject
63.
Jun 15, 2005Jun 15 2005
       Re: This Just In
69.
Jun 19, 2005Jun 19 2005
       Re: No subject
56.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
35.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
39.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
40.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
42.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
55.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
41.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
53.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
65.
Jun 15, 2005Jun 15 2005
57.
Jun 14, 2005Jun 14 2005
68.
Jun 18, 2005Jun 18 2005