Out of the Blue

Yesterday's trip to introduce Gunnar to his Uncle Sparky went great, everybody got along famously, and by the end 14-year-old Sparky was horsing around with the youngsters like he was a puppy himself. Gunnar did leave a submarine-sized turd in the bedroom, but it cleaned up pretty readily, and he was forgiven for his toilet training shortcomings. This morning, however, Hudson the wonder dog resumed her recent spate of picking on the other dogs in her trail-running pack, focusing on large males and unfamiliar faces, as she seems quite determined to exert her dominance over the group as alpha dog... if this continues as it is, I may actually have to stop taking her out to run with this crowd, which would be a shame.

Who knows what links lurk in the hearts of men? Thanks Mike Martinez and Ant.
Links of the Day: The Time Traveler Convention. Thanks Brian.
You're fired. Thanks Ant.
Story of the Day: Berman: Trek needs a rest.
Down Under cemetery given OK to bury dead standing up.
Washington Bureaucrats Make Way for Ducklings.
Science: Testing a Sun-Powered Space Sail.
Auction of the Day: Barris Motor Car Collection. Thanks Devicer.
Images of the Day: Scandals 3.
Teh Funnies: FoxTrot.
Follow-ups: Bill Would Outlaw Sale of Copied Cats.
Scientists: Life on Mars Likely.
NASA Scrubs Shuttle Launch. Thanks Loonybomber.
View : : :
83.
 
Re: I'll tell you what f**ked up Star Trek
May 3, 2005, 06:55
83.
Re: I'll tell you what f**ked up Star Trek May 3, 2005, 06:55
May 3, 2005, 06:55
 
Star Trek: TNG was a masterpiece because it wasn't loaded with a bunch of small talk, shooting the breeze, stupid humor, or otherwise irrelevant dialogue. It was straight-forward sci-fi, serious and to the point. It showed human potential in its efficiency.

What can you say to something like this? In my opinion, you have an extremely flawed view on Star Trek. Every Star Trek, beginning with the original series, at times focused on characters. No Star Trek ever was military-esque, and conversely a military-esque series based on the Trek universe wouldn't truly be a Star Trek series. (Of course, good military-esque series still end up focusing on the characters - see BSG!)
TNG certainly did - what with Picard's trauma from the Borg, Data's struggling with humanity, Wesley's coming of age (which I hate now, but loved as a kid) and oh just about every episode where Troy says more than two words. DS9 and Voyager was the same, I won't mention the many character-driven aspects now. I don't think Enterprise is "worse" in any such regard, if anything there's less of it (mostly just the Tucker-T'pol thing, what else?).

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
2.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
3.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
23.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
24.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
4.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
5.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
14.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
   Puppy Poo
6.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
7.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
8.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
9.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
     Re: No subject
15.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
      Re: No subject
17.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
       Re: No subject
10.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
11.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
12.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
18.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
19.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
20.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
22.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
21.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
27.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
28.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
     No subject
30.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
      Re: No subject
35.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
      Re: No subject
37.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
       Re: No subject
29.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
31.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
32.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
36.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
13.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
16.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
43.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
52.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
53.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
54.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
55.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
56.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
75.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
92.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
     Re: No subject
93.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
      Re: No subject
94.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
       Re: No subject
58.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
76.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
84.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
87.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
      Re: Sci-Fi books
89.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
       Re: Sci-Fi books
90.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
        Re: Sci-Fi books
60.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
65.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
25.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
26.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
70.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
33.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
34.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
38.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
39.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
40.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
44.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
45.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
46.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
47.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
48.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
49.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
51.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
57.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
59.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          Re: Can we change the topic?
61.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
           Re: Can we change the topic?
62.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
64.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
66.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          WOOT!
67.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          Re: Can we change the topic?
68.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          Re: Can we change the topic?
69.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
           Re: Can we change the topic?
73.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
            Re: Can we change the topic?
74.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
             Re: Can we change the topic?
80.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
              Re: Can we change the topic?
82.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
               Re: Can we change the topic?
91.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
               Re: Can we change the topic?
81.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
             Re: Can we change the topic?
86.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
           Re: Can we change the topic?
50.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
63.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
71.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
72.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
85.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
41.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
42.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
77.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
79.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
 83.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
 Re: I'll tell you what f**ked up Star Trek
88.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005