Out of the Blue

Yesterday's trip to introduce Gunnar to his Uncle Sparky went great, everybody got along famously, and by the end 14-year-old Sparky was horsing around with the youngsters like he was a puppy himself. Gunnar did leave a submarine-sized turd in the bedroom, but it cleaned up pretty readily, and he was forgiven for his toilet training shortcomings. This morning, however, Hudson the wonder dog resumed her recent spate of picking on the other dogs in her trail-running pack, focusing on large males and unfamiliar faces, as she seems quite determined to exert her dominance over the group as alpha dog... if this continues as it is, I may actually have to stop taking her out to run with this crowd, which would be a shame.

Who knows what links lurk in the hearts of men? Thanks Mike Martinez and Ant.
Links of the Day: The Time Traveler Convention. Thanks Brian.
You're fired. Thanks Ant.
Story of the Day: Berman: Trek needs a rest.
Down Under cemetery given OK to bury dead standing up.
Washington Bureaucrats Make Way for Ducklings.
Science: Testing a Sun-Powered Space Sail.
Auction of the Day: Barris Motor Car Collection. Thanks Devicer.
Images of the Day: Scandals 3.
Teh Funnies: FoxTrot.
Follow-ups: Bill Would Outlaw Sale of Copied Cats.
Scientists: Life on Mars Likely.
NASA Scrubs Shuttle Launch. Thanks Loonybomber.
View : : :
16.
 
Re: Attention Rick Berman
May 2, 2005, 12:48
16.
Re: Attention Rick Berman May 2, 2005, 12:48
May 2, 2005, 12:48
 
I like Voyager and I like Enterprise. Most criticism of Enterprise I have seen was based on nothing

Actually, I think if someone doesn't like the show, it doesn't matter what he/she bases it on. The fact is, they DON'T like it.
And since viewer ratings for Enterprise were plain awful, I think there were a lot of people who just didn't like it.

My biggest beef with Enterprise was the entire idea of it being a prequel in the first place. We've just watched 24 seasons of Star Trek in which NO MENTION is ever made of Captain Archer and staff, and 21 seasons in which everyone relates to James T Kirk as being the pioneer of the federation, the hero of the galaxy etc.
And then all of a sudden, we create a series with Cpt Archer and Co who save the universe 837000 times. And yet nobody knows about them.
Ehh, okay.
And the whole "watch them rub gel into each other eight times per season" got really old after the first time. If I really want to watch some skinny chick having crap rubbed on her, I'll Google it.

For 21 years, they built the continuity of the Star Trek universe, making sweeping changes to the relations between the races (the Federation/Klingon/Romulan alliance, for example), setting up the stage for a grand epic show, and then they shove it all under the rug, and we go to the delta quadrant and the Pre-Federation. WHAT THE FUCK??

Trek has always suffered from the "bad few seasons" syndrome. Even TNG's first and second season weren't that great. It just makes you wonder why it always seems to take Trek's writers three seasons to finally come up with some good plotlines.
DS9 was bloody AWFUL in its first two years, but after season three, it became by far the best Trek series.
Voyager was "jab-pencil-in-eyeball" kind of bad in the first seasons, but the last couple of seasons were pretty good. Same for TNG.
So why couldn't Enterprise recover? Well, maybe because the premise of the show really wasn't all that interesting to begin with. (and maybe because several of the 'actors' in the group were Harry Kim / Neelix / Wesley Crusher combined.)

They need some new writers, and they need them bad. They also need to do something more involved than Voyager or Enterprise. We have this whole universe to play with, so PLAY with it. We had a brilliant setup after DS9, only to have nothing done with it for a full decade.

Have more far reaching consequences. Stop resetting the clock after every episode. Instead of proclaiming "Nobody in the Galaxy can go faster than Warp Speed 5", and just leaving it like that, give us a few episodes where we see what that decision means for the galaxy, woven into the normal storyline where characters yap against each other.
The reruns are still getting good enough ratings, so there's definitely a demand for more Trek. Resting the show for half a decade really isn't going to bring back more viewers, if it ever comes back.

Creston

Avatar 15604
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
2.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
3.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
23.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
24.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
4.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
5.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
14.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
   Puppy Poo
6.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
7.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
8.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
9.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
     Re: No subject
15.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
      Re: No subject
17.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
       Re: No subject
10.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
11.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
12.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
18.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
19.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
20.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
22.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
21.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
27.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
28.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
     No subject
30.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
      Re: No subject
35.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
      Re: No subject
37.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
       Re: No subject
29.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
31.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
32.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
36.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
13.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
 16.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
  Re: Attention Rick Berman
43.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
52.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
53.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
54.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
55.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
56.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
75.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
92.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
     Re: No subject
93.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
      Re: No subject
94.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
       Re: No subject
58.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
76.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
84.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
87.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
      Re: Sci-Fi books
89.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
       Re: Sci-Fi books
90.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
        Re: Sci-Fi books
60.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
65.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
25.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
26.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
70.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
33.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
34.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
38.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
39.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
40.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
44.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
45.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
46.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
47.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
48.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
49.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
51.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
57.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
59.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          Re: Can we change the topic?
61.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
           Re: Can we change the topic?
62.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
64.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
66.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          WOOT!
67.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          Re: Can we change the topic?
68.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
          Re: Can we change the topic?
69.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
           Re: Can we change the topic?
73.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
            Re: Can we change the topic?
74.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
             Re: Can we change the topic?
80.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
              Re: Can we change the topic?
82.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
               Re: Can we change the topic?
91.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
               Re: Can we change the topic?
81.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
             Re: Can we change the topic?
86.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
           Re: Can we change the topic?
50.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
63.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
71.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
72.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
85.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
41.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
42.
May 2, 2005May 2 2005
77.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
79.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005
88.
May 3, 2005May 3 2005