Half-Life 2 EULA Legal Issues?

Is the Half-Life 2 EULA illegal? on the Inquirer (thanks Ant) describes possible legal issues surrounding the End-User License Agreement for Half-Life 2 and the Steam service. Here are a couple of hefty excerpts:
...The German Consumer Association has recently found that the packaging on Half-Life 2 is misleading. In a report made following complaints from the public, they said that the mere listing of an internet connection under the 'other' category in system requirements did not accurately describe the true extent of the internet tie-in with the game, and ordered Vivendi to amend the packaging and untie Steam from HL2 or face a hefty fine. See this page. How far other consumer associations will agree with the Germans is yet to be seen, but it seems a no-brainer that Steam should be mentioned on the retail pack.

The return of software has traditionally been a bugbear for gamers. Most shops, at least in the UK, have a policy not to allow the return of opened software because of piracy risks. However, most consumers are not aware that, in some cases at least, this is in breach of their statutory legal rights, which cannot be infringed. This page at the UK's Office of Fair Trading conveniently notes an example of when goods can be returned as faulty:...

It is quite conceivable that any gamer not being able to connect to Half-Life 2 is entitled to a legal refund in the UK. The case would hinge around whether or not the inability to play the game without persistent net connection, or the previous hacking of the CD Key rendering it unplayable, makes the game unfit for the purpose described on the box. This could well be a winner.

The last issue is the most interesting and relates to a number of other cases that have come up over the last couple of years. According to US and UK law, under the principle known in the US as 'First Sale', a consumer buying a game takes absolute title to it; that is, they own it. ...

But, arguably, you can't transfer the CD Key without paying the $10 Steam charge, because otherwise it's still registered to you at Valve, meaning you haven't truly transferred ownership to the buyer.

However, here's something else. No mention of the Steam software is made in the EULA for Half-Life 2. This means that the terms of the Steam EULA that you agree to when installing that software are almost certainly not incorporated into the contract you agree to when installing Half-Life 2. Consequently, the $10 transfer fee would not be enforceable because it isn't in the HL2 contract, and Valve would be acting illegally in blocking any sale of the game from one person to another.
View : : :
162.
 
Re: No subject
Feb 8, 2005, 21:03
Re: No subject Feb 8, 2005, 21:03
Feb 8, 2005, 21:03
 
id do have an almost god-like reputation respect within the gaming community to do almost anything without too much bitching coming from end-users purely because of their almost invention of modern FPS games.
Your web browser must filter out all of the many posts which bash Doom 3 on this forum.

if Valve had spent another year or so
Steam is a bad idea even when it works 100%. Steam is about a developer having total control over the use, distribution, and price of its games. And, that's definitely not good for consumers.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
2.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
8.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
9.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
12.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
16.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
20.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
78.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
      Re: steam
79.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
       Re: steam
81.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
       Re: steam
87.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
        Re: steam
88.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
        Re: steam
89.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
         Re: steam
139.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
          Re: steam
140.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
           Re: steam
142.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
            Re: steam
151.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
           Re: steam
114.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
13.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
21.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
23.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
29.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
36.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
37.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
        Let's keep this civil...
38.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
49.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
27.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
30.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
31.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
86.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
14.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
17.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
19.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
24.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
28.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
32.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
33.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
35.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
39.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
45.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
54.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
62.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
65.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
67.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
94.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
18.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
25.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
34.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
44.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
47.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
95.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
100.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
125.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
148.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
152.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
153.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
154.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
158.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
161.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
3.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
4.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
5.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
6.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
10.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
7.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
11.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
15.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
22.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
26.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
40.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
42.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
41.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
43.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
48.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
50.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
51.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
52.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
53.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
46.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
55.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
56.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
57.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
59.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
70.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
104.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
121.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
122.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
131.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
136.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
137.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
58.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
63.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
64.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
80.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
60.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
61.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
66.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
68.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
69.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
71.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
74.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
75.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
76.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
77.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
82.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
72.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
73.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
83.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
84.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
85.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
90.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
91.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
92.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
93.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
101.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
102.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
103.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
105.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
    grrr
117.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
98.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
159.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
160.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
 162.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
    Re: No subject
166.
Feb 9, 2005Feb 9 2005
     Re: No subject
167.
Feb 9, 2005Feb 9 2005
      Re: No subject
97.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
124.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
106.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
107.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
109.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
108.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
110.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
111.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
112.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
113.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
118.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
120.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
    Re: Oh yes
123.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
    Re: Oh yes
126.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
     Re: Oh yes
127.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
      Re: Oh yes
128.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
       Re: Oh yes
119.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
129.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
    Re: Oh yes
115.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
116.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
130.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
133.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
134.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
141.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
149.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
150.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
165.
Feb 9, 2005Feb 9 2005
168.
Feb 9, 2005Feb 9 2005
169.
Feb 10, 2005Feb 10 2005
156.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
132.
Feb 7, 2005Feb 7 2005
143.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
155.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
157.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
146.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
147.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
135.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
138.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
144.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
145.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
163.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
164.
Feb 8, 2005Feb 8 2005
170.
Feb 10, 2005Feb 10 2005
171.
Feb 11, 2005Feb 11 2005