S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Delayed Again

The German THQ News Page (thanks Frans) has word that STALKER: Shadow of Chernobyl, has suffered another delay. Previously expected for May of this year (story), the game no longer seems to carry a specific release date. No reason for the delay is offered, but GSC Game World's PR Manager Oleg Yavorsky gamely spins this announcement, saying they are pleased that THQ has given them more time to develop their upcoming first-person shooter.
View : : :
25.
 
Re: Someone
Feb 2, 2005, 14:20
25.
Re: Someone Feb 2, 2005, 14:20
Feb 2, 2005, 14:20
 
I dont believe this "world stimulator*" thingy. Lamo and unnecessary, just loads npc's, mobs, zone by zone. Their freaking monseters they walk, they sleep, they eat. Gothic II does that and I think Gothic I and its fine. Just bump up the npc, specific npc behavior and you got Stalker in a bottle.

Hahahaha. Aside from your absolutely abysmal grammar, it's ridiculously obvious that you've never even bothered to learn about the complexity of a good A.I. system. It's fucking tough. Hell, Black and White's creature A.I. had an programmer entirely dedicated to JUST THAT, the second B&W was said to have a team of A.I. programmers working on various A.I. systems for the various creatures.

It's not like programmers just throw together a set of legos and say "Oh-ho, A.I!" Though, in all honesty, I think some of DOOM 3's enemies were created that way.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
2.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
4.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
5.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
7.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
8.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
10.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
11.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
12.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
13.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
14.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
19.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
20.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
21.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
22.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
24.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
27.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
29.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
28.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
30.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
31.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
            Re: No subject
32.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
             Re: No subject
39.
Feb 3, 2005Feb 3 2005
            Revolutionary Features?
40.
Feb 3, 2005Feb 3 2005
           Re: Gandhi
6.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
9.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
3.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
15.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
16.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
17.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
18.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
23.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
 25.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
 Re: Someone
26.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
33.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
34.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
35.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
36.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
37.
Feb 2, 2005Feb 2 2005
38.
Feb 3, 2005Feb 3 2005