22.
 
Re: No subject
Jan 26, 2005, 13:34
22.
Re: No subject Jan 26, 2005, 13:34
Jan 26, 2005, 13:34
 
Tim, you're such stupid fanboi. Are you a lawyer working for rambus?

You use the word "outperform" but you're only using the memory bandwidth to compare performance, you don't mention that RDRAM had/has a huge latency disadvantage. That's like comparing sports car using top speed as your only criteria.

Let's take a trip down memory lane and look at some benchmark from when RDRAM was introduced to see why it tanked: http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=1245&p=13 .

What's so hard to understand that Rambus are shady because they kept their patents secrets, got the IP into the standard, then started suing everyone?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_patent

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
2.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
3.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
4.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
5.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
6.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
7.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
8.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
9.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
10.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
11.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
12.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
21.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
13.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
15.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
20.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
16.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
17.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
18.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
19.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
24.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
     Re: No subject
 22.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
   Re: No subject
23.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
26.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
     Re: No subject
25.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
27.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
28.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
29.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
     Re: No subject
30.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
     Re: No subject
32.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
      Re: No subject
33.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
       Re: No subject
34.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
        Re: No subject
36.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
         Re: No subject
37.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
          Re: No subject
40.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
           Re: No subject
41.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
            Re: No subject
42.
Jan 27, 2005Jan 27 2005
             Re: No subject
38.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
         Re: No subject
39.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
          Re: No subject
35.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
       Re: No subject
31.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
     Re: No subject
14.
Jan 26, 2005Jan 26 2005
43.
Jan 27, 2005Jan 27 2005
44.
Jan 27, 2005Jan 27 2005
45.
Jan 27, 2005Jan 27 2005
46.
Jan 27, 2005Jan 27 2005