New Tribes Vengeance Demo

A third playable demo for Tribes Vengeance is now available, offering another chance to sample single-player action in the latest installment in the science fiction shooter series. Word is: "In the demo, gamers play the role of Mercury, a robot assassin hired to locate and eliminate Daniel, a captain of the local Phoenix subclan." The 415 MB download can be found on this VU Games FTP server, and mirrors can be found on 3D Downloads, 3D Gamers, ActionTrip, FileFront, Filerush (torrent), FileShack (registration required), Gamer's Hell, GameSpot DLX (registration required), and Worthplaying.
View : : :
50.
 
Don't know why...
Jan 4, 2005, 19:25
50.
Don't know why... Jan 4, 2005, 19:25
Jan 4, 2005, 19:25
 
This game was great, BUT OF COURSE THE HARD CORE TRIBES FANS HAD TO HATE IT!!! I loved this game, it was fun as hell and I paid $50 for it and it was worth every penny! They should not of even called this TRIBES if the fanboys all denounced it. They knew it was going to get slack before it was even released from the feedback from the demos. The graphics were fantastic (Definately better than UT2004 graphically) I didn't even think the UT2004 engine could do bumpmapping until I seen this game. It's obvious that alot of love went into this game from the developers and it didn't go unnoticed because the reviews were all mostly very positive. This game is a victim of bad timing and a hardcore fan base that it hard to please. GAME SEQUELS ARE SUPPOSE TO EVOLVE THE GAME, if they didn't every FPS would still be playing identical to DOOM1!Well chalk up another franchise for the PC down the drain, if there is another Tribes game it'll be on a next gen console and PC gaming will loose a little bit more. FUCK THE CONSOLES! I WANT PC GAMES TO THRIVE! I want games to be successful if they are good quality and this game certainly deserved success. The single player was the best part of the game for me, its just a shame that it failed...

"When all thats left is console gaming, I will game no more."
Avatar 16493
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
2.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
3.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
8.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
4.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
5.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
6.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
7.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
10.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
11.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
13.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
14.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
18.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
    Re: Really?
20.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Re: Really?
32.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
      Re: Really?
21.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     woops
30.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Re: Really?
31.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
      Re: Really?
16.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
9.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
12.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
15.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
17.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
29.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
41.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
    Re: Sigh...
43.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Re: Sigh...
19.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
22.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
23.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
24.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
25.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
27.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
28.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
26.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
36.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
33.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
34.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
37.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
38.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
40.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
42.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Re: No subject
47.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
      Re: No subject
54.
Jan 5, 2005Jan 5 2005
       Re: No subject
55.
Jan 5, 2005Jan 5 2005
        Re: No subject
56.
Jan 5, 2005Jan 5 2005
         Re: No subject
57.
Jan 5, 2005Jan 5 2005
          Re: Unreal offline
45.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
46.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Re: No subject
49.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
      Re: No subject
48.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Re: No subject
 50.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
     Don't know why...
51.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
    Re: booo
35.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
39.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
44.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
52.
Jan 4, 2005Jan 4 2005
53.
Jan 5, 2005Jan 5 2005