Computer voting just isn't something that is practical or desired. The only reason to have it is either to create a way to make money by trying to introduce a new way to vote (I didn't say better), or to have a whole new range of ways to manipulate results.
Canada has paper ballots, most of the country turns out to vote, and they all seem to get counted without controversy or confusion. Perhaps someone in government should ask Canada for their voting system details. Then again, accurate voting wouldn't be in the best interest of most politicians.
Anyone catch the voter registration denials in Ohio because they weren't the right weight of paper? Ken Blackwell, Ohio Secretary of State and self-labeled Neo-Conservative, has invalidated thousands of voter registrations using an arcane Ohio law that says they had to be on a certain weighted cardstock make them valid. Now leaving aside the fact that Ohio Board of Elections has on their website a registration form that they encourage people to download and print out (without any such paper specifications), Blackwell said it was because it could possibly cause postal machines to jam. Not that any reports of that have happened, in the years since the website promoted this method of registration. This is in violation of the 1971 Voting Rights Act, by the way. Also, since Blackwell doesn't have jurisidction, any Federal voter registration forms printed out and sent in must be honored (so much for those poor postal workers). So what is the real reason to deny these registrations? Wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that, in Ohio, newly registered voters are 10 Democrats for every 1 Republican, right?
http://www.daytonforkerry.com/Blackwell.pdfhttp://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/26/politics/campaign/26vote.htmlSec. 1971. - Voting rights
(a) Race, color, or previous condition not to affect right to vote; uniform standards for voting qualifications; errors or omissions from papers; literacy tests; agreements between Attorney General and State or local authorities; definitions
(1)
All citizens of the United States who are otherwise qualified by law to vote at any election by the people in any State, Territory, district, county, city, parish, township, school district, municipality, or other territorial subdivision, shall be entitled and allowed to vote at all such elections, without distinction of race, color, or previous condition of servitude; any constitution, law, custom, usage, or regulation of any State or Territory, or by or under its authority, to the contrary notwithstanding.
(2)
No person acting under color of law shall -
(A)
in determining whether any individual is qualified under State law or laws to vote in any election, apply any standard, practice, or procedure different from the standards, practices, or procedures applied under such law or laws to other individuals within the same county, parish, or similar political subdivision who have been found by State officials to be qualified to vote;
(B)
deny the right of any individual to vote in any election because of an error or omission on any record or paper relating to any application, registration, or other act requisite to voting, if such error or omission is not material in determining whether such individual is qualified under State law to vote in such election.
Edit: Formatting and punctuation etc.
This comment was edited on Sep 28, 13:27.