Valve versus Sierra

Valve vs. Vivendi Universal dogfight heats up in US District Court on GameSpot (thanks Democritus) reveals some details of a behind-the-scenes legal battle between Valve and Sierra (now part of VU Games) over Half-Life and Half-Life 2 that's been brewing for several years now. The article picks through details of a recent court filing by Valve that reveals the current state of the litigation, which has its next court date on October 8, though an actual trial is not scheduled until March 21, 2005. Included are disputes over what role Steam is to take in the game's distribution and who actually holds rights to the Half-Life intellectual property. Here's a segment that summarizes some of this:
In court filings, Sierra/VUG says that the current distribution of Half-Life 2 via Steam exceeds the scope of the current software publishing agreement between the two parties. It is apparently seeking the court's assistance in compelling Valve not to use Steam as an avenue of distribution.

On Friday, when asked if Valve was remained intent on making Half-Life 2 available to gamers via Steam, regardless of what was determined on October 8, Lombardi replied, "Yes."

Interestingly, and in spite of the ongoing legal dispute, Sierra/VUG still wants to work with Valve in the future and is asking the court via filings to force Valve to work with it on whatever is next in the development pipeline. It asks the court, in filings, "for a declaration that Sierra and VUG have the right to a fourth engine license pursuant to the terms of...the 2001 Agreement."

According to Lombardi, "We're going to meet the obligations of our current agreement."
View : : :
140.
 
Re: regarding steam..
Sep 21, 2004, 03:27
Re: regarding steam.. Sep 21, 2004, 03:27
Sep 21, 2004, 03:27
 
Rilus, it may come to your mind that I dont comment on "arguments" that are totally idiotic and factless. I cant even change your opinion with the hardest facts and you want me to start to argue about idiot shit you posted? Right...

Did you actually notice that I gave more than 2 examples why Valve is more likely to do something stupid like implement spyware than other devs (even if its not very likely)? Yet you still claw yourself to it with your kiddy fanboy comments, ignoring everything I said. That normally is typical if you run out of arguments (or facts).
I am very sorry that I ignore your Newton approved comments and maybe hurt your ego with it, but somehow I feel more and more stupid the more I answer to such factless mud. Just look at your newly discovered evolve theory. I couldnt anything but laugh at it, or I would have felt extremely dumb to explain the word "evolve" to you. And be honest, would you simply come here again and say "oh yeah I was wrong, you are right". hahahaha in my 10 years of internet experience Ive never seen something like that happen with your kind. Soooo... I simply laughed at you.

The CPU usage problem I talked about (duh) and you seem to know nothing about but still had to spit out your opinion about. look below.

Skirtman: You might want to install a personal firewall or Motherboard Monitor and leave them in the background. Then open the taskmanager and look at the CPU usage of those programs, and while youre at it watch steam closely aswell, even though it wont be that frequent as MBM or the FW (you actually have to watch a few minutes). Its not much CPU power that is used but in demanding games you can notice it, even though most people dont notice it at all because it is so relative from person to person. Just like if some guys dont care if they are playing a game with a ping of 150 and others suck badly if their ping is any higher than 50.
I think I somewhere read that it has impact on 3dmark 03 and similar benchmarks, but you wont see it on your fps rate displayed on your screen. No wonder why those overclocking freaks only benchmark their computer with an empty taskmanager or fresh installed OS.
You might want to look into any hardware/software forum for more info about this. but it seems as you are one of those guys (the majority anyway) who dont notice it, heck even I dont notice it most of the time. But when I see my friends playing at their computers and other people on LANs I notice it very well.

noman: Oh, still a few more icons (which lead you to the awesome Steam browser too) on my desktop compared to JUST ONE for all kinds of games from various different developers that has awesome filters and a very nice and efficient query engine and only accesses the internet when you tell it to.
I was also under the impression that Steam checks for new modules and updated Steam version every few hours or so. I didnt know that you could switch to offline mode while playing a game over steam either. And if you want to go into offline mode you have to select it after you stopped playing, rightclicking the icon and shutting it down is faster actually.... well ok, that shutdown delay may make it faster switching to offline mode actually, lol.
All in all, Steam is slow as shit compared to GameSpy or ASE.
on a side note, what would you say if some car manufacturer would suddenly develop their own steering method and you have 4 cars, 1 or 2 from that mentioned manufacturer (which would get their steering reconstructed for free - but forced)?
I know I know, "if its a good steering method..." oh well. I hope you get my point anyway.

________
I don't like arguing. Why can't we all just get along instead of fighting and arguing?
I have given up on waiting for BIS to come back to their senses and do a real ArmA 2 successor.
Avatar 12928
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
2.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
3.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
31.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
53.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
58.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
117.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
4.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
6.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
5.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
7.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
9.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
13.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
19.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
8.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
10.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
11.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
12.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
22.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
35.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
15.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
21.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
86.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
88.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
89.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
90.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
94.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
98.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
100.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
103.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
104.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
107.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
113.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
         Re: regarding steam..
95.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
99.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
102.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
105.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
128.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
133.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
134.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
135.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
136.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
 140.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
         Re: regarding steam..
137.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
148.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
138.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
141.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
142.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
143.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
144.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
         Re: regarding steam..
145.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
          Re: regarding steam..
147.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
           Re: regarding steam..
149.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
            Passion
150.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
            Re: regarding steam..
151.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
             Re: regarding steam..
152.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
              Re: regarding steam..
153.
Sep 22, 2004Sep 22 2004
               Re: regarding steam..
14.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
20.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
24.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
25.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
36.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
47.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
38.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
51.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
16.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
23.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
17.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
18.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
26.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
27.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
28.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
32.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
33.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
   Re: LOL
34.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
    Re: LOL
39.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
    Money
41.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
     Re: Money
45.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
     Re: Money
50.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
      Re: Money
52.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
      Re: Money
49.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
     Re: Money
54.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
      Re: Money
37.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
29.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
30.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
63.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
40.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
44.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
42.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
46.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
 :)
43.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
48.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
70.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
55.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
56.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
57.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
59.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
76.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
60.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
61.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
62.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
64.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
66.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
74.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
75.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
65.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
68.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
69.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
112.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
132.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
72.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
67.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
71.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
73.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
77.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
78.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
79.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
81.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
82.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
80.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
83.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
84.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
101.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
114.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
116.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
85.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
87.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
91.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
92.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
96.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
97.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
93.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
106.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
131.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
108.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
110.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
115.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
111.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
109.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
118.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
121.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
122.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
125.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
126.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
129.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
130.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
119.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
120.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
123.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
127.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
139.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
146.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
154.
Sep 22, 2004Sep 22 2004
155.
Sep 22, 2004Sep 22 2004
156.
Sep 24, 2004Sep 24 2004
157.
Sep 26, 2004Sep 26 2004