Valve versus Sierra

Valve vs. Vivendi Universal dogfight heats up in US District Court on GameSpot (thanks Democritus) reveals some details of a behind-the-scenes legal battle between Valve and Sierra (now part of VU Games) over Half-Life and Half-Life 2 that's been brewing for several years now. The article picks through details of a recent court filing by Valve that reveals the current state of the litigation, which has its next court date on October 8, though an actual trial is not scheduled until March 21, 2005. Included are disputes over what role Steam is to take in the game's distribution and who actually holds rights to the Half-Life intellectual property. Here's a segment that summarizes some of this:
In court filings, Sierra/VUG says that the current distribution of Half-Life 2 via Steam exceeds the scope of the current software publishing agreement between the two parties. It is apparently seeking the court's assistance in compelling Valve not to use Steam as an avenue of distribution.

On Friday, when asked if Valve was remained intent on making Half-Life 2 available to gamers via Steam, regardless of what was determined on October 8, Lombardi replied, "Yes."

Interestingly, and in spite of the ongoing legal dispute, Sierra/VUG still wants to work with Valve in the future and is asking the court via filings to force Valve to work with it on whatever is next in the development pipeline. It asks the court, in filings, "for a declaration that Sierra and VUG have the right to a fourth engine license pursuant to the terms of...the 2001 Agreement."

According to Lombardi, "We're going to meet the obligations of our current agreement."
View : : :
106.
 
No subject
Sep 20, 2004, 19:59
No subject Sep 20, 2004, 19:59
Sep 20, 2004, 19:59
 
I refuse to play Halflife 2 just because they suggested the mandatory use of steam, and I couldn't care less if they decide to change their minds. As far as I'm concerned Valve sucks and their games be damned. I liken Steam to that CoolSearch toolbar/virus that the asshole creators insist is for our benefit.

I don't like Windows accessing the net for whatever "helpful" reasons, I disable autoupdates, and yet that bloated pig of an OS still triggers ZoneAlarm more times than I can count. Creating a ton of firewall rules for a new windows XP installation is now just a regular part of installing the OS. I will NOT tollerate that shit for a stinkin game.

Those self-important jackasses must be suffering from a god-complex, and as far as I'm concerned, anyone who pays for a copy of half-life 2 only to relenquish their privacy or any control over their own machines/games to Valve is as much a part of the problem as the ever increasing sleazoids in the software industry. If ever a game cried out to be pirated, it's this one, and I hope enough of it happens to put those control freaks out of business forever.

I am SICK AND TIRED of being punished for the acts of pirates when I spend my hard-earned godamn money on a game...especially when NONE of their counterpiracy measures EVER work. NONE! Wnen will these freaking idiots learn that? I have never bought a *popular* game that somebody at work didn't brag about downloading for free. Even Doom3! I pay for all my games, and feel ripped off enough when I have to wait for patches like a good beta-tester (though I must admit Doom3 was flawless), but to be told my money aint good enough, and that they want access to my freakin hard drive?!!

Screw you Valve, and screw anyone who supports them and is too dumb to see the sleazy precedent Valve wants to set for the rest of the software developers who may follow suit.

That's my rant, sorry if it's already been said, but the more it gets said, hopefully the more people will realize that supporting Valve is just plain wrong. And I really don't want to hear the company line from any valve fanboys... I'll regard you with the same sneering disdain that I reserve for the assholes who insist pop-up windows are really a good thing, and that combined with cookies can direct the "right kind" of advertising to your desktop to "better serve you". Pfft! When it comes to things like Steam, CoolSearch, Cookies, etc... I automatically assume the company line is bullshit if not outright lies.

I don't care if they don't spy, I don't care if it hogs resources, I don't give a rat's ass what it does or does not do...I will not buy a game and be told I have to install another piece of superfluous software that is not the game in order to play the game. That is the marketing genius of complete assholes at work.

I can update my own games Valve, and I don't need you converting my game machine into a Valve machine...so take your HL2 and shove it right up your friggin @sses.

Geezer

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
2.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
3.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
31.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
53.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
58.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
117.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
4.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
6.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
5.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
7.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
9.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
13.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
19.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
8.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
10.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
11.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
12.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
22.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
35.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
15.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
21.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
86.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
88.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
89.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
90.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
94.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
98.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
100.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
103.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
104.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
107.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
113.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
         Re: regarding steam..
95.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
99.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
102.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
105.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
128.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
133.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
134.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
135.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
136.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
140.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
         Re: regarding steam..
137.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
148.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
138.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
141.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
       Re: regarding steam..
142.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
143.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
        Re: regarding steam..
144.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
         Re: regarding steam..
145.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
          Re: regarding steam..
147.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
           Re: regarding steam..
149.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
            Passion
150.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
            Re: regarding steam..
151.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
             Re: regarding steam..
152.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
              Re: regarding steam..
153.
Sep 22, 2004Sep 22 2004
               Re: regarding steam..
14.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
20.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
24.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
25.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
36.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
47.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
38.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
51.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
16.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
23.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
17.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
18.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
26.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
27.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
28.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
32.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
33.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
   Re: LOL
34.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
    Re: LOL
39.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
    Money
41.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
     Re: Money
45.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
     Re: Money
50.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
      Re: Money
52.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
      Re: Money
49.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
     Re: Money
54.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
      Re: Money
37.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
29.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
30.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
63.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
40.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
44.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
42.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
46.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
 :)
43.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
48.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
70.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
55.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
56.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
57.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
59.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
76.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
60.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
61.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
62.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
64.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
66.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
74.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
75.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
65.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
68.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
69.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
112.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
132.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
72.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
67.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
71.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
73.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
77.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
78.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
79.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
81.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
82.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
80.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
83.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
84.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
101.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
114.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
116.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
85.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
87.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
91.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
92.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
96.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
97.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
93.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
 106.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
No subject
131.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
108.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
110.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
115.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
111.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
109.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
118.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
121.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
122.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
125.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
126.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
129.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
130.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
119.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
120.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
123.
Sep 20, 2004Sep 20 2004
127.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
139.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
146.
Sep 21, 2004Sep 21 2004
154.
Sep 22, 2004Sep 22 2004
155.
Sep 22, 2004Sep 22 2004
156.
Sep 24, 2004Sep 24 2004
157.
Sep 26, 2004Sep 26 2004