Hey, it's that imbecile, Furious, who has wasted the last 4 and a half years of his life posting almost 600 times to this message board. Good show, you go-getter!
Hey wow, it's that semi-retarded guy that
LOL, so now I am just "semi" retarded to you? Oh my self-esteem is just soaring. LOL!
1) Stated the Painkiller Demo did not reflect the true game because it was to old,
That was true of the original beta demos to which I was referring. With the v1.3.5 update, it is also now somewhat true of the current v1.3 demo as well.
the TWO demos that were released for the public to try.
There were more than just the two most recent demos released. There were also two previous beta demos, i.e. v0.91 and v0.92.
But yeah, ESP boy here can state that the demos are not
necessarily indicative of the full game
Yes, game demos are not necessarily indicative of the full game on which they are based. Nor can a game demo necessarily show how repetitve and boring the full game is. A game like Painkiller may be enjoyable to some for a few levels. However, after four or five levels it may become monotonous. So, even if one liked the demo version, that does not necessarily mean they would enjoy the entire game.
So dumbass once again comes to the boards to rip Painkiller becuase he paid for the full version without even trying the TWO demos
No, dumbass, I am criticizing Painkiller because it sucks as a game. Whether or not I bought it without trying the most recent demo version or any demo version at all is a moot point. The game is a mindless shooter without even any humor or campy appeal to offset it's simplicity and boring repetitiveness. I can see though why you like the game so much since you obviously have so much in common with it. LOL!This comment was edited on Sep 15, 12:05.