Carmack on DOOM 3 & Q3A OpenSource [Aug 04, 2004, 10:07 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
This Slashdot
post from John Carmack (thanks shul and Frans) offers his reflections on the
release of DOOM 3, as he proudly says: "I think it is the best game we have ever
made, and it exceeded all of my expectations."
A subsequent
reply from the id Software lead programmer on the subject of the OpenSource
release of Quake III Arena, states: "By the end of the year. There are still a
lot of higher priority things, but it is coming soon. Hopefully punkbuster will
keep the source release from having any negative impact on the player
community." Here's a bit more from the first post on id's near-future roadmap:
Amidst all the various Doom ports and expansions, we are starting up on our next game. It will have a new rendering engine, which will be keeping me busy for a while, but the only other thing we are saying for now is that it won't be a sequel to any of our previous work. We have a really solid team that did a lot of maturing through Doom's development, so I have high hopes that it won't be another four year odyssey.
Coming from the guy who liked SOLDNER, please, don't disrespect a game when you have no taste.
Nice to see that someone dug through three pages of my posts just to find something to take a dig at. Okay, I'll respond to that. I said the demo seems okay. Then I mention in the same paragraph how the server browser works poorly and the vehicle physics aren't any good. But those don't really work for your arguement do they? Not to mention the post a page before that when I said Soldner sucked. So now that I've blown that up, you care to address anything I've said or are you just going to Ad Hominem me till your head asplode?
Nice to see that someone dug through three pages of my posts just to find something to take a dig at. Okay, I'll respond to that. I said the demo seems okay. Then I mention in the same paragraph how the server browser works poorly and the vehicle physics aren't any good. But those don't really work for your arguement do they? Not to mention the post a page before that when I said Soldner sucked. So now that I've blown that up, you care to address anything I've said or are you just going to Ad Hominem me till your head asplode?
Date
Subject
Author
Copyright © 1996-2024 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2024 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 10 October 2024, 06:35.