Half-Life 2 Imminent?

HalflifeSource (thanks HomeLAN Fed) is reporting news from Valve's Doug Lombardi, saying: "Half-Life 2 will be passed on to publisher Vivendi for final mastering and duplication within days for it's early August target. The official appearance will make store shelves sometime in mid to late September."
View : : :
103.
 
Re: uh huh
Jul 29, 2004, 10:15
Re: uh huh Jul 29, 2004, 10:15
Jul 29, 2004, 10:15
 
I don't like all this DOOM3/HL2 hating going on. They are both going to be excellent but for different reasons.

Agreed--it's really ridiculous when you think about it as I'm sure that most people, like me, will be buying both games. Buying software isn't remotely like the prospect of buying a $400US 3d card which generally and routinely requires that a single choice be made by the consumer among competing products.

I also agree that the nature and content of HL2 and D3 will be radically different both in terms of story, presentation, and 3d-game game environments (a lot of HL2, for instance, takes place in outside, open-air environments whereas I believe D3 is mainly, if not wholly, restricted to building interiors.)

What made the initial HL so compelling and so much fun was the originality, depth, and the unfolding of the storyline on which the game was based. It was a very entertaining experience for me and I've found HL1 somewhat unique in that sense among all the computer games I've ever played. My only curiosity for HL2 is whether Valve can manage to "do it again"--with the same degree of originality and depth of HL1, or hopefully, with even more of all that good stuff.

My curiosity about about ID software and D3 is whether ID is capable of producing a compelling, deep, original, and highly entertaining single-player game with an unfolding story line to match. ID's games up to this point in time do not fit that description, but excel in other ways exclusive of the single-player story they tell (if any.) So this is going to be my primary concern for D3. In a sense for me, both HL2 and D3 will be competing against the original HL in terms of how entertaining these games actually are, based on their respective single-player story lines and their respective presentations.

I worry that both Valve and ID are putting far too much emphasis on the 3d-rendering qualities of their game engines, and that neither company is saying much at all about the quality and depth of the stories told by each game. That seems precariously unbalanced to me, as a moving and compelling, *original* and entertaining story line is worth far more software sales in the long run than how shiny and reflective scene objects may appear on screen when rendered correctly by an appropriate 3d card. I worry far more about the "frame-rate" relative to the story told by these games than I do about the 3d-card rendering frame rate of either game.

In one narrow, practical sense, what Valve and ID are doing in promoting the scene-rendering capabilities of their upcoming games vicariously through the 3d-card IHVs is understandable. If you don't have a 3d-card, you can't play these games, so by promoting 3d-card vendors the game developers are helping to create larger markets for their 3d games. Problems occur, though, when a developer spends 75% of his game development time and attention on 3d-rendering engine technicalities and approaches, general scene artwork, textures, and audio tracks; but only 25% of his time, money, and energy are devoted to the very thing that provides all of those things with any value--the originality, quality, and depth of the story told by the game. To paraphrase "bubba": "It's the story, stupid!" Heh...:D

It's just a bedrock fact relative to the the 3d games industry that "today's" SOA 3d-rendering game engine is "tomorrow's" bargain-bin rendering engine, as 3d-engines of all description, regardless of their authors, age and obsolesce very quickly these days as the pace of 3d-hardware development is running at a break-neck pace.

But a good and compelling story, well told, can last forever.

It is well known that I cannot err--and so, if you should happen across an error in anything I have written you can be absolutely sure that *I* did not write it!...;)
Avatar 16008
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
4.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
6.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
11.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
14.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
    Re: uh huh
15.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
     Steam
18.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
      Re: Steam
19.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
       Re: Steam
24.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
      Re: Steam
25.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
       Re: Steam
26.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
       Re: Steam
27.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
        Re: Steam
28.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
        Re: Steam
29.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
         Re: Steam
30.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
          Re: Steam
46.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
          Re: Steam
48.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
           Re: Steam
45.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
       Re: Steam
17.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
    Re: uh huh
 103.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
   Re: uh huh
9.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
10.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
13.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
2.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
3.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
5.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
7.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
8.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
12.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
16.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
83.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
91.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
23.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
41.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
68.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
70.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
72.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
73.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
75.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
77.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
78.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
     Re: No subject
79.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
      Re: No subject
80.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
       Re: No subject
110.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
       Re: No subject
74.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
76.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
88.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
60.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
20.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
21.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
22.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
61.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
62.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
63.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
107.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
31.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
33.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
35.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
39.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
37.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
44.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
47.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
65.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
     Re: No subject
71.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
      Re: No subject
32.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
36.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
34.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
38.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
40.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
97.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
98.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
42.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
43.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
49.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
50.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
54.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
57.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
64.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
51.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
52.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
53.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
55.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
56.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
58.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
59.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
66.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
67.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
69.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
81.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
82.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
84.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
86.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
87.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
90.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
85.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
89.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
95.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
92.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
105.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
106.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
108.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
109.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
93.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
96.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
94.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
99.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
102.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
100.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
101.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
104.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
111.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
112.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
113.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
114.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
115.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
116.
Jul 30, 2004Jul 30 2004