More on Creative and DOOM 3

A post to the Beyond3D Forums (thanks ASLayerAODsk) follows-up on news that id Software has made a deal for shadow technology that will be used in DOOM 3 (story). The article offers the site's disapproval of patents in general and expresses some skepticism about the legitimacy of Creative's claims, but the accompany quote from John Carmack positions this all as a matter of practicality:
The patent situation well and truly sucks.

We were prepared to use a two-pass algorithm that gave equivalent results at a speed hit, but we negotiated the deal with Creative so that we were able to use the zfail method without having to actually pay any cash. It was tempting to take a stand and say that our products were never going to use any advanced Creative/3dlabs products because of their position on patenting gaming software algorithms, but that would only have hurt the users.
View : : :
7.
 
Re: Who Cares?
Jul 28, 2004, 11:25
7.
Re: Who Cares? Jul 28, 2004, 11:25
Jul 28, 2004, 11:25
 
too true

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
3.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
2.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
4.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
5.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
11.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
6.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
 7.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
 Re: Who Cares?
8.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
16.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
23.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
27.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
32.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
34.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
35.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
37.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
39.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
42.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
41.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
44.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
38.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
40.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
43.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
45.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
47.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
49.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
77.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
83.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
84.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
86.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
56.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
9.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
10.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
12.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
14.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
65.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
66.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
67.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
68.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
69.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
70.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
71.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
72.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
       Re: Books vs Movies
74.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
        Re: Books vs Movies
75.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
         Re: Books vs Movies
78.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
          Re: POO ASS
15.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
19.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
17.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
22.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
29.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
33.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
18.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
24.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
20.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
21.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
26.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
25.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
30.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
31.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
52.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
36.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
46.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
54.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
55.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
48.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
50.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
51.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
87.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
88.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
89.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
90.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
91.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
92.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
      Re: Pie vs. Cake
93.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
       Re: Pie vs. Cake
94.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004
53.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
57.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
58.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
59.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
60.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
61.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
62.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
63.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
64.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
96.
Jul 30, 2004Jul 30 2004
73.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
76.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
79.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
82.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
80.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
81.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
85.
Jul 28, 2004Jul 28 2004
95.
Jul 29, 2004Jul 29 2004