Out of the Blue [Jun 17, 2004, 11:40 am ET] – Share – Viewing Comments
So the Architect tells Neo that they've destroyed Zion six times now, but then later refers to Neo's five predecessors. I they've destroyed Zion six times, wouldn't he be the seventh Neo? If there was a version of this event that didn't include a Neo (or if the Architect was simply lying), I would hope that would be clarified. On the other hand, if this repopulate Zion scenario took place as he described, wouldn't the "old" Neo be part of Zion's current populace? I guess this all speaks again to how disappointed I was in how few further wrinkles about all this were included in Matrix Revolutions.
| Play Time: | Beat the Bugs. A UGO Starship Troopers 2 promotion. |
| Links of the Day: | When the zombies take over, how long till the electricity fails? |
| Stories of the Day: |
TechTV Fans Mad as Hell. Chicken killers ordered to clean coops. Thanks Baldric. Truck hauling bees crashes in Montana. Thanks Jerry. |
| Science!: |
Scientists Teleport Not Kirk, but an Atom
(registration required). Thanks athlonseven. Shell boss 'fears for the planet'. Scientists find rodent monogamy gene. |
| Image of the Day: | APOD 2004 June 7 - Mammatus Clouds Over Mexico. Thanks Enahs. |
| Auction of the Day: | My son's 2 Phish Tickets. Thanks Jeff. |
| Follow-ups: |
Ramones Guitarist Losing Fight with Cancer -Report. Global Chaos, Just for Fun. Foul ball Video. Thanks Jennerstein. |
| Thanks Mike Martinez |
You are not reading everything. You take bits and use them out of context.
I'm not trying to spin anything.
How so?? You have not said anything to back you statements up.
WMD is still being looked for. Why do you insist that Saddam was innocent? Try reading everything before shooting off.
It's been over 1 1/2 years and they haven't found crap. The case for the war was built on the fact that we knew where these stockpiles were and yet nothing has been found. I'ved used statment from the 9/11 comissions debunking any Cooperation between Obl and Saddam. Seems like you need to be the one who starts to read things.
Jay
Those link still don't show any hard proof. Posting a few op-eds don't show hard proof that anything has occured. The fact that chalabie lied damns it even more. Once some sold proof comes out and not just allegations then i'll believe there was something deeper.
Abbas was a none issue since he was exiled.
Zarquawi was working in the kurdished controled portion of Iraq. Like I've said before there has been no proof that Saddam and Al Qaida worked to attack the US and the 9/11 comission agrees with me.
I'm not saying Iraq was sympathetic towards terroism but I am saying and it has been proven that Saddam didn't work with any terrorist to attack the US, its as simple as that.
This comment was edited on Jun 18, 16:51.
Copyright © 1996-2025 Stephen Heaslip. All rights reserved.
All trademarks are properties of their respective owners.
Privacy Policy. Manage Cookie Settings.
News CGI copyright © 1999-2025 James "furn" Furness & Blue's News. All rights reserved.
Chatbear v1.5.0/blue++: Page generated 12 July 2025, 13:01.