So the Architect tells Neo that they've destroyed Zion six times now, but then later refers to Neo's five predecessors. I they've destroyed Zion six times, wouldn't he be the seventh Neo? If there was a version of this event that didn't include a Neo (or if the Architect was simply lying), I would hope that would be clarified. On the other hand, if this repopulate Zion scenario took place as he described, wouldn't the "old" Neo be part of Zion's current populace? I guess this all speaks again to how disappointed I was in how few further wrinkles about all this were included in Matrix Revolutions.
Play Time: | Beat the Bugs. A UGO Starship Troopers 2 promotion. |
Links of the Day: | When the zombies take over, how long till the electricity fails? |
Stories of the Day: |
TechTV Fans Mad as Hell. Chicken killers ordered to clean coops. Thanks Baldric. Truck hauling bees crashes in Montana. Thanks Jerry. |
Science!: |
Scientists Teleport Not Kirk, but an Atom
(registration required). Thanks athlonseven. Shell boss 'fears for the planet'. Scientists find rodent monogamy gene. |
Image of the Day: | APOD 2004 June 7 - Mammatus Clouds Over Mexico. Thanks Enahs. |
Auction of the Day: | My son's 2 Phish Tickets. Thanks Jeff. |
Follow-ups: |
Ramones Guitarist Losing Fight with Cancer -Report. Global Chaos, Just for Fun. Foul ball Video. Thanks Jennerstein. |
Thanks Mike Martinez |
i get called a troll even though i didn't bring up anything any more retarded than the rest of u guysYour comment had nothing to do with anything we were discussing, and had no intention other than goading Halsy, because of his known love for Reagan. It was effective, don't get me wrong.