Out of the Blue

Hey! It's 06/05/04 today, at least in typical American notation... What say we all wait until exactly 3:21:00 and all simultaneously shout "blastoff!" Oh well, maybe not... especially since that would have been more appropriate at 3:21 a.m. Well, appropriate is probably the wrong word to use there either... Hmmm, nevermind.

Play Time: SpaceWander Roundtrip First Class. Thanks javagrrl9.
Links of the Day: ImplosionWorld.com Thanks Ant and memepool.com.
Camouflage Duct Tape ~ Camouflage Gaffers Tape.
Stories of the Day: Man Driving Armored Bulldozer Rampages Through Town. Thanks Kar.
Elderly woman awarded $1.2 million for ant attack at nursing home. Thanks Bronco (and not Ant?).
How it feels to get shot.
Science!: Cassini spacecraft closing in on Saturn.
Ocean explorer returns to Titanic.
Drowning in an Ocean of Plastic.
Media of the Day: Outlet Industries four-cross wheelchair. Thanks Jim Chaney.
Auctions of the Day: Baldur's Gate II Premium Golden Ale & Glass Tankard.
Star Wars Episode 3 - ILM - RARE - Crew Lint. Thanks Gordon.
Follow-up: Transit of Venus.
Thanks Mike Martinez
View : : :
43.
 
Re: Halsy
Jun 6, 2004, 12:30
Enahs
 
43.
Re: Halsy Jun 6, 2004, 12:30
Jun 6, 2004, 12:30
 Enahs
 
I guess it comes down to your viewpoint. I like the mUn33z , but I only need so much and I think it should be the responsibility of everybody to help out one another rather than continuing this "ME ME ME!!!11111" cycle. I will pay X percent, if you will pay X percnet. I make Y percent more than you and I expect to pay Y percent more taxes.

Can I have a HUZZAH for the equality of percentages???

Yes, I completely agree that everyone should want to help each other out, and when I am rich I would not care to be filthy rich. The fact is I have done more for charity then most people that make $100,000 a year, and yet I am a broke ass college student barely getting by (for now).

And my point was less concerned with the filthy rich. As you said, you can take half away from them and they are still filthy rich.

My point is more towards the people who are just well off, say the average college graduate that gets a good job in his or her field. The people that make $40,000 to around $200,000. People that worked hard to get to where they are (ok, sometimes not!) and deserve rewards for all the work they did, but it is taken away because of a flat tax.

To avoid fighting, you just make one constant, flat percentage.

No, to avoid fighting, you just make one constant dollar amount per person per year. Unfortunately that would not work, as it would take billions and billions away in tax income that the “rich” are paying.

But you still danced around the issue.

How it is supposed to work, one person now matter how much they make should get the same equal rights, privileges and representation as someone who makes less. Why should someone have to pay 10X+++ times someone else for equal rights? That is the problem I have, and it is a HUGE freakin problem. If you can say that because someone makes more via working their asses off or having it handed to them, they should have to pay more money for equal rights, how in the freak does that even approach fair? Please explain that to me?


_____
Enahs If you can read this - congratulations - You have won!!! Just e-mail with your CC# to claim your prize!
I am free of all prejudice. I hate everyone equally.
- W. C. Fields
Avatar 15513
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
2.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
3.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
4.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
24.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
5.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
6.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
7.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
11.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
8.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
9.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
10.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
12.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
13.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
14.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
15.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
22.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
16.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
18.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
17.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
20.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
25.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
28.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
19.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
21.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
23.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
26.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
27.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
29.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
30.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
31.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
33.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
   Re: Halsy
34.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
    Re: Halsy
36.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
38.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
39.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
44.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
       Re: Halsy
35.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
   Re: Halsy
37.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
    Re: Halsy
42.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
46.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
40.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
    Re: Halsy
41.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
 43.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
45.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
       Re: Halsy
48.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
        Re: Halsy
51.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
         Re: Halsy
53.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
          Re: Halsy
54.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
           Re: Halsy
55.
Jun 7, 2004Jun 7 2004
            Re: Halsy
47.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
49.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
50.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
       Re: Halsy
52.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
32.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004