Out of the Blue

Hey! It's 06/05/04 today, at least in typical American notation... What say we all wait until exactly 3:21:00 and all simultaneously shout "blastoff!" Oh well, maybe not... especially since that would have been more appropriate at 3:21 a.m. Well, appropriate is probably the wrong word to use there either... Hmmm, nevermind.

Play Time: SpaceWander Roundtrip First Class. Thanks javagrrl9.
Links of the Day: ImplosionWorld.com Thanks Ant and memepool.com.
Camouflage Duct Tape ~ Camouflage Gaffers Tape.
Stories of the Day: Man Driving Armored Bulldozer Rampages Through Town. Thanks Kar.
Elderly woman awarded $1.2 million for ant attack at nursing home. Thanks Bronco (and not Ant?).
How it feels to get shot.
Science!: Cassini spacecraft closing in on Saturn.
Ocean explorer returns to Titanic.
Drowning in an Ocean of Plastic.
Media of the Day: Outlet Industries four-cross wheelchair. Thanks Jim Chaney.
Auctions of the Day: Baldur's Gate II Premium Golden Ale & Glass Tankard.
Star Wars Episode 3 - ILM - RARE - Crew Lint. Thanks Gordon.
Follow-up: Transit of Venus.
Thanks Mike Martinez
View : : :
38.
 
Re: Halsy
Jun 6, 2004, 12:10
38.
Re: Halsy Jun 6, 2004, 12:10
Jun 6, 2004, 12:10
 
'Cuz it is a percentage?

Look at taxes in a narrow scope...say, roads. Do you get better roads than I do? Do I get better roads than you do? Do I drive them more - do I have to pay a higher amount? Do I drive them less - do I have to pay a lesser amount? What if I do not drive that road there; do I get discounted that road and pay less per year. Does that mean a new road, driven by many people, gets bajillions of dollars while that older street, driven by only a few yet in crappy condition, gets no money?

To avoid fighting, you just make one constant, flat percentage.

Things work in reverse as well. You complain about the extra burden (yet identical tex percent) of the higher income, but you make no mention of the increased ease of living with the extra income.

For instance, lets take two people, completely strip them of everything, and send them on their merry way. For person one, I give $5, but levy a 20% tax - that person now only has $4. Good luck, sucker.

For person two, I give $1,000,000,000 and levy a whopping 50% tax - that person now only has $500,000,000. Wow, what a tough break that second person has. Er...can I sign up for this second deal, though?

Mind you, these are very generic and exaggerated, but consider which of these two people has things easier? And that is with completely uneven tax percentages. If you hate percentages and the statistical equality that they can provide, what would you consider fair? How about we all pay the same monetary tax that the $10,000,000 pays. Enahs, did you make over a $1,000,000 last year? If not, you are seriousl f00k3d - you worked your ass off last year and it was all for naught. You actually owe the government some $900,000 now.

I guess it comes down to your viewpoint. I like the mUn33z :o, but I only need so much and I think it should be the responsibility of everybody to help out one another rather than continuing this "ME ME ME!!!11111" cycle. I will pay X percent, if you will pay X percnet. I make Y percent more than you and I expect to pay Y percent more taxes.

Can I have a HUZZAH for the equality of percentages???

As a single person, I am tired of paying an extra amount of taxes because I am not in some (as are the majority in this country) sham marriage, but I know the U.S./people are not ready to look into that. Hell, the people still have trouble with certain people even being allowed to become married.

Realizing most people have t3h gr33d,
Ray

-----
"You're worried about morals? Beat them senseless and steal their clothing, dammit! Steal! Steal!!"
http://users.ign.com/collection/RayMarden
http://www.dvdaficionado.com/dvds.html?cat=1&sub=ANF&id=ray_marden
I love you, mom.
Everything is awesome!!!
http://www.kindafunny.com/
I love you, mom.
Avatar 2647
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
2.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
3.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
4.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
24.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
5.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
6.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
7.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
11.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
8.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
9.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
10.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
12.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
13.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
14.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
15.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
22.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
16.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
18.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
17.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
20.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
25.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
28.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
19.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
21.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
23.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
26.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
27.
Jun 5, 2004Jun 5 2004
29.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
30.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
31.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
33.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
   Re: Halsy
34.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
    Re: Halsy
36.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
 38.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
39.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
44.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
       Re: Halsy
35.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
   Re: Halsy
37.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
    Re: Halsy
42.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
46.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
40.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
    Re: Halsy
41.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
43.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
45.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
       Re: Halsy
48.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
        Re: Halsy
51.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
         Re: Halsy
53.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
          Re: Halsy
54.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
           Re: Halsy
55.
Jun 7, 2004Jun 7 2004
            Re: Halsy
47.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
     Re: Halsy
49.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
      Re: Halsy
50.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
       Re: Halsy
52.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004
32.
Jun 6, 2004Jun 6 2004