Specter of a Spector Departure?

Shacknews is reporting that "multiple sources" inform them that Warren Spector "is said to be leaving" ION Storm, reporting the Austin Texas-based developer has also laid off 20-25 employees. Ion Storm Implodes is the headline on a similar story on IGN, which reports on the layoffs, as well as Eidos' explanation that this was a normal staff reduction associated with the completion of the pair of game projects that were underway at ION, quoting the publisher as dismissing the idea that Warren was laid off as well, though they don't actually come out and say he did not quit. They have yet to receive a reply from ION Storm, but this was Eidos' response to questions about Warren's departure:
"Ah rumors... well that sounds like a good one... but it is just a rumor," said the representative. "He certainly has not been laid off."
View : : :
66.
 
A good game is a good game
May 29, 2004, 18:02
66.
A good game is a good game May 29, 2004, 18:02
May 29, 2004, 18:02
 
Can somebody please explain the logic of this? I just read a comment a few down this thread that said that it makes perfect sense for companies to make one game that cuts across all platforms.

I just don't get this line of reasoning. Console games have an entirely different feel, play style and immersion than PC games. Not worse per se, but quite different.

Console games are played sitting on a couch, 10 ft from the TV, often with friends, for an hour at a time. They have great driving and fighting games in particular.

PC games are often played solo, 18-24 inches from a high-res monitor, for hours at a time due to immersion. Strategy, RTS, simulations and FPS are the PC hallmark. Complexity of options and controls is another.

Console games don't port well to PCs, and PC games often fail going to consoles. Even KOTOR, the exception to this general rule, suffered considerably from "dumbing down" to fit the X-Box. C'mon - tell me that keeping KOTOR's storyline, graphics, characters, but adding a little more of NWN or BG2's tactical complexity would have made it a worse game?

I think they're fundamentally different markets - in style, consumer base, etc. Why don't the publisher's understand this?

Put another way, DX:IW was made for both X-Box and PC to make more sales, then if it was PC alone. Yet couldn't a case be made that DX:IW would have sold more total copies if it was a quality PC game only, rather than a rushed, botched port?

A Luddite PC gamer,

Istari

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
2.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
3.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
4.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
5.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
6.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
7.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
8.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
9.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
10.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
11.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
12.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
14.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
15.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
16.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
17.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
18.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
20.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
19.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
21.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
     Re: No subject
13.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
22.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
23.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
24.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
25.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
26.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
27.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
29.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
30.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
31.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
32.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
33.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
34.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
35.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
        Re: Warren Spector / DX2
36.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
         Re: No subject
37.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
         Re: Warren Spector / DX2
38.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
          Re: Warren Spector / DX2
39.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
           Re: Warren Spector / DX2
28.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
40.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
41.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
42.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
43.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
53.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
63.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
65.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
44.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
45.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
62.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
46.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
48.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
49.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
69.
May 30, 2004May 30 2004
70.
Jun 2, 2004Jun 2 2004
47.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
51.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
52.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
56.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
57.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
59.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
     Re: No subject
60.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
      Re: No subject
61.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
       Re: No subject
50.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
54.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
64.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
55.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
58.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
 66.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
A good game is a good game
67.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
68.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004