Ships Ahoy - Thief & Singles

Eidos sends word of the online release of Singles: "Eidos (NASDAQ: EIDSY), one of the world's leading publishers and developers of entertainment software, today announced Singles: Flirt Up Your Life is now available for North America via online download. Singles, developed by the German development company, Rotobee, is an extreme reality simulation game for the PC that takes relationship building further than any other game has before. Eidos, in partnership with Deep Silver, a division of the KOCH Media Group, has made Singles: Flirt Up Your Life for PC available for purchase as of today on major online download sites." They also announce the release of Thief: Deadly Shadows in this press release:
Eidos plc, one of the world's leading publishers and developers of entertainment software, today announced it has shipped to stores across North America the highly-anticipated Thief: Deadly Shadows for the Xbox® video game system from Microsoft and PC. Thief: Deadly Shadows is the third chapter in the Thief saga, which originated the stealth gaming genre. For the first time in Thief franchise history, the game will be available on a game console and will feature a third-person perspective. Thief: Deadly Shadows leaves actions, decisions and consequences in the hands of the gamer -- the master thief Garrett.
View : : :
70.
 
Re: No subject
May 27, 2004, 23:46
70.
Re: No subject May 27, 2004, 23:46
May 27, 2004, 23:46
 
I've finished the first level - expert, took me 109 minutes first time through. It does feel like thief, which is good. I can't wait till I start to get deeper into it.

The control is ok, it seems a little clunky, definately not as elegant as the first two, but not bad enough to fuss over it. Same goes with the first person view that lets you see your body. I'd prefer to look down and see nothing casting a shadow rather than noticing my arms and legs as I'm looking around - reason being is the shadow problem wouldn't present itself that often (you don't usually look that far down), whereas seeing your arms happens quite frequently and a few times so far has distracted me enough to do a double-take. I'm sure I'll get used to it and it won't bother me. I'm not going to bother with third person view. I switched to see what Garret looks like, then switched back.

As far as the level partitions go, the one in the first mission didn't bother me much. It didn't detract from the gameplay enough to worry about.

What does bother me though is how the light is handled. I'm surprised I haven't seen anyone else complain. When I started playing I felt like I was being assaulted with light glitches. Sections of walls would flicker from being lit to being dark and then back again every step. In other places, walls would shine brightly while items right in front were pitch black. Thankfully turning off light bloom fixes this for the most part, but there still are many light problems that remain. For example, in the kitchen, closing the oven door would prevent the light from the fire from showing on the floor, but the wall opposite to it still brightly glows orange.

I prefer the dark engine's static lighting to this. At least it was consistent. Where the floor is dark, you'd be dark. Thief3 actually plays the same, you can safely walk anywhere where the floor is dark. However now a torch with a light radius of 5 feet on the floor has its dynamic light casting shadows 20 feet away. By the end of the first mission I'm used to it, but it doesn't make much sense and really lowers the level of immersion.

While I'm on it, someone asked earlier if guards see your shadow - they don't. I've walked up to guards with my shadow in plain view on the floor in front of him without any response at all. With how the lighting is messed up now, I'm quite thankfull it works that way.

As mentioned, the engine gets a C- for speed. It's playable, but my 3ghz P4 and 9700pro should be able to run it smoothly, and in a few of the larger rooms, it definately was not smooth. It's not a video limitation either, running with 4xfsaa and no fsaa gave about the same framerate. I hope this isn't worse for people with slower CPUs...

This comment was edited on May 27, 23:47.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
2.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
7.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
9.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
11.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
12.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
13.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
    Review
18.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
     Re: Review
19.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
      Re: Review
3.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
4.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
5.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
6.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
8.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
10.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
15.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
20.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
21.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
24.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
28.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
29.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
14.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
16.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
17.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
22.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
23.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
26.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
25.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
27.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
35.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
37.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
39.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
41.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
42.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
     Re: No subject
43.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
      Re: No subject
30.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
31.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
32.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
33.
May 25, 2004May 25 2004
34.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
36.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
40.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
38.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
44.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
45.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
 Hmm
47.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
46.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
48.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
 Re:
49.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
50.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
51.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
52.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
53.
May 26, 2004May 26 2004
54.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
55.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
56.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
57.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
59.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
62.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
63.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
    Re: Question
58.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
60.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
61.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
64.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
65.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
66.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
67.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
68.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
69.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
 70.
May 27, 2004May 27 2004
   Re: No subject
71.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
72.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
     Re: No subject
73.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
75.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
     Re: No subject
77.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
      Re: No subject
78.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
       Re: No subject
79.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
        Re: No subject
82.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
     Re: No subject
83.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
      Re: No subject
74.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
76.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
80.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
81.
May 28, 2004May 28 2004
84.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
85.
May 29, 2004May 29 2004
86.
May 30, 2004May 30 2004
    Re: PC Game