ATI/Counter-Strike 2 Bundle?

Counter Strike 2 to be bundled with X800PRO-XT on the Inquirer (thanks Stoo) has more on their rumor of another ATI/Valve bundle deal, even as gamers with previous generation ATI cards wonder what video card they will be using when their Half-Life 2 bundle is eventually fulfilled. According to the report, this is a scenario that could possibly play itself out yet again: "For their side, ATI partners are not comfortable to go for one more bundle as there is still no game available. Summer could well mean the end of summer rather than the beginning and it will still take some time to finish Counter Strike 2. This might easily put ATI in a position where it has another card, the R480, before the piece of paper can be exchanged for the real thing."
View : : :
53.
 
Re: H-L 2 promo
May 10, 2004, 19:30
53.
Re: H-L 2 promo May 10, 2004, 19:30
May 10, 2004, 19:30
 
Gabe Newell said that x800 is 40% faster then a 6800u in Half-Life2. Which boggles my mind because as many comparisons have stated the shader engine on the 6800u is far superior to that of the x800

I'd really like to know which of the "many comparisons" have said that.

offering not only shader 3.0 support but DX9c support AND virtually unlimited shader programing.

Shader 3.0 support in the 6800? Is that why, when Farcry detects that you have a 6800 in your system, it defaults to the setting where it ONLY uses 1.1 shaders, and NO 2.0 shaders? If Nvidia can't even get decent performance out of their 2.0 shaders, why would we give a shit about 3.0?

You simply CANNOT tell me with any truth that Valve isn't programing there game to work great on ATI hardware, and sup-par on nVidia hardware.

How long have you been in the PC gaming market, exactly? Ever heard of "Nvidia, The Way It's Meant To Be Played"? or ATI's promo (forgot the name)?
Ofcourse that's what Valve is doing, since they partnered with ATI. Other games do the same with Nvidia. In the end, it's all fucked up, so please stop your Nvidia Fanboy Righteous Indignation over the whole thing.

Not when John Carmack is so in favor of shader 3.0 and nvidias new card that he is already building his next engine USING IT!

Oh right, because Carmack is actually just plain stupid and really thinks that in, oh about five years, when his next engine is going to replace Doom 3, he'll still be using Shaders 3.0.
Carmacks always goes with the fastest card, it doesn't mean shit. It just means that whatever he's promoting at that point is the fastest card at that point. There's a pretty good chance that when he gets his hands on ATI's next baby, he'll switch stances again. He's been known to do that from time to time.

Stop viewing the world through your Nvidia box, it might help your perspective a little.


Creston

This comment was edited on May 10, 19:33.
Avatar 15604
Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
2.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
3.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
4.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
11.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
   Re: LOL
5.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
6.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
7.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
8.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
9.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
10.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
12.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
13.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
14.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
    H-L 2 promo
15.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
     Re: H-L 2 promo
16.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
     Re: H-L 2 promo
17.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
      Re: H-L 2 promo
22.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
       Re: H-L 2 promo
24.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
       Re: H-L 2 promo
25.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
        Re: H-L 2 promo
26.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
         Re: H-L 2 promo
27.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: H-L 2 promo
29.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: H-L 2 promo
33.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: H-L 2 promo
34.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
           Re: H-L 2 promo
28.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
        PS3.0
30.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
         Re: PS3.0
31.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: PS3.0
32.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
           Re: PS3.0
35.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: PS3.0
37.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: PS3.0
38.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
           Re: PS3.0
39.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
            Re: PS3.0
44.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
         Re: PS3.0
50.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
          Re: PS3.0
51.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
           Re: PS3.0
55.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
            Re: PS3.0
56.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
             Re: PS3.0
58.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
              Re: PS3.0
59.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
              Re: PS3.0
60.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
               Re: PS3.0
61.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
                ON -ITS- WAY
62.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
                Re: PS3.0
63.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
                Re: PS3.0
65.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
         Re: PS3.0
66.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
          Re: PS3.0
68.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
           Re: PS3.0
18.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
      Re: H-L 2 promo
19.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
       Re: H-L 2 promo
23.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
     Re: H-L 2 promo
 53.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
     Re: H-L 2 promo
54.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
      Re: H-L 2 promo
20.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
57.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
21.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
36.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
40.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
41.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
42.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
49.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
43.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
45.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
47.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
48.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
52.
May 10, 2004May 10 2004
64.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
67.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
69.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
70.
May 11, 2004May 11 2004
71.
May 12, 2004May 12 2004