Thief Date

Thief Gets Release Date on IGN reports receiving an official release date from Eidos for Thief: Deadly Shadows, ION Storm's upcoming third installment in the stealthy Thief series that began at Looking Glass Studios. According to the story, the game is expected for release on both the PC and Xbox on May 26, though the territories covered on that date are not specified.
View : : :
63.
 
Re: No subject
May 2, 2004, 12:37
63.
Re: No subject May 2, 2004, 12:37
May 2, 2004, 12:37
 
If only it were so easy as tweaking an INI or two. We'd have a new game hitting shelves every other day.

Multiplayer takes a lot of work to pull off. Coop multiplayer is a real beast to work out. The entire game has to be designed around it. Serious Sam-type titles dont matter: they're just fragfests (not a bad thing, of course, but not the only thing either). Heavily scripted games (Half Life, Far Cry, etc.) need to be specifically designed around the multiplayer experience for that sort of thing to work. Or, you can just cheat a la Halo, and warp players together whenever they stray too far apart from one another.

The PS2 port of Half Life offers a good glimpse of how a coop campaign can take full advantage of using two players working as a team (as opposed to Halo's cheesedick solution). Its coop campaign has some flaws, surely, but it's a blast, and much more involving than Halo's coop. If it hadn't popped up quietly in the console port of a five-year-old game, it'd probably have set a new standard within the industry.

Simple DM multi is a lot easier, but Far Cry is a good example of how a game designed specifically with the one-man experience in mind can easily fail in this area. Forget Far Cry's cumbersome multiplayer interface and worthless netcode; the gameplay was focused on a single player and doesn't lend itself well to DM or CTF.

Returning to the topic at hand: skepticism in the new Thief title is well warranted. All indications point to a style of gameplay departing significantly from its predecessors, which fanboys really have no right to complain about. Seriously, no developer has any obligation to make a game to satisfy followers of their previous efforts.

But more importantly, the game is utilizing an engine that is well known to be fucked to the point of unplayability. In order to make any game on IW's engine enjoyable, that engine would need to be overhauled to such a degree that you might as well just scrap it and start from ground zero. But they haven't. So unless this engine turns out to be an extreme example of a diamond in the very, very fucking rough, Thief 3 will be filth unworthy of even Microsoft's ugly black box.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
6.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
2.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
3.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
4.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
5.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
7.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
8.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
9.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
10.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
13.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
26.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
12.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
11.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
14.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
15.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
18.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
20.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
27.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
29.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
32.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
41.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
43.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
48.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
47.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
40.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
51.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
52.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
53.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
      Fingers Crossed
54.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
       Re: Fingers Crossed
55.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
       No subject
56.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
57.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
59.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
60.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
        No subject
58.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
61.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
62.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
       No subject
 63.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
        Re: No subject
66.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
         Re: No subject
67.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
          Re: No subject
68.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
           Re: No subject
69.
May 3, 2004May 3 2004
            Re: No subject
64.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
65.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
17.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
19.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
21.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
23.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
24.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
25.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
   Re: OHBOY
22.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
28.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
30.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
31.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
36.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
35.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
37.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
38.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
39.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
42.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
45.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
46.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
44.
May 1, 2004May 1 2004
49.
May 2, 2004May 2 2004
70.
May 3, 2004May 3 2004
71.
May 3, 2004May 3 2004