2.
 
Re: No subject
Apr 23, 2004, 15:42
2.
Re: No subject Apr 23, 2004, 15:42
Apr 23, 2004, 15:42
 
I presume you're talking about the chastity belt article (the don't turn off your PC article also takes Google to task, but largely because the author is an idiot).

The article points out a completely valid issue -- if you have Google's "SafeSearch" enabled (to avoid sex-related search results) it really shouldn't block sites that aren't objectionable -- like www.partsexpress.com -- just because the letters s, e, and x are sequentially contained in the URL. I don't see an easy workaround, but it's still a valid issue.

As for your "numerous ads" complaint -- Google doesn't have that issue, with or without SafeSearch enabled. Your criticism is misplaced.

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
 2.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
 Re: No subject
3.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
4.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
5.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
6.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
7.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004
8.
Apr 23, 2004Apr 23 2004