I presume you're talking about the chastity belt article (the don't turn off your PC article also takes Google to task, but largely because the author is an idiot).
The article points out a completely valid issue -- if you have Google's "SafeSearch" enabled (to avoid sex-related search results) it really shouldn't block sites that aren't objectionable -- like www.partsexpress.com -- just because the letters s, e, and x are sequentially contained in the URL. I don't see an easy workaround, but it's still a valid issue.
As for your "numerous ads" complaint -- Google doesn't have that issue, with or without SafeSearch enabled. Your criticism is misplaced.