On Team Fortress 2

Missing in Action: The Lost Games of the PC, Part 3 on IGN tries to ascertain the true status of several game projects that haven't been heard from in a while, including Loose Cannon (TBD), Pantheon (RIP), Sovereign (RIP), and Imperium Galactica III / Galaxy Andromeda / Nexus: The Jupiter Incident (still breathing). Along the way, they talk with Valve's Doug Lombardi, who fills us in on the status of TeamFortress 2, the planned reworking of the popular modification (to correct a point in the article, the original T.F. was for Quake) that you may have heard discussed by your grandparents:
Here's the word from Valve's Doug Lombardi: "Some time after we announced Team Fortress 2, which was then being created on the HL1 tech, the decision was made to move the project to the Source Engine, the same engine used for HL2. The project is still in development here at Valve and we will be announcing more info after HL2 ships."
View : : :
53.
 
Re: No subject
Apr 18, 2004, 06:43
53.
Re: No subject Apr 18, 2004, 06:43
Apr 18, 2004, 06:43
 
Well excuse me for trying to add to the thread. After all earlier in the thread the other games in the article had been mentioned. Just because this is my 1st post does not make me a troll. it is on topic of the IGN article as a whole.

In reference to TFC2, does anyone remember it being shown about a year ago on TechTV?

---

(my Nexus fan site. Check it out)
http://home.earthlink.net/~cgh5541/
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
2.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
13.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
18.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
20.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
28.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
29.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
     Re: No subject
31.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
      Re: No subject
32.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
       No subject
33.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
        Re: No subject
40.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
      Re: No subject
42.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
       Re: No subject
43.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
        Re: No subject
44.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
         Re: No subject
45.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
          Re: No subject
46.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
           Re: No subject
47.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
            Re: No subject
48.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
             Re: No subject
50.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
              Re: No subject
49.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
             Re: No subject
3.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
11.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
51.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
52.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
54.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
55.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
58.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
     Re: No subject
 53.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
  Re: No subject
4.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
5.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
7.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
19.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
6.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
8.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
17.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
9.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
10.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
12.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
14.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
15.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
16.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
21.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
22.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
23.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
25.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
26.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
24.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
27.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
30.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
34.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
35.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
36.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
37.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
38.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
39.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
41.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
56.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
57.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
59.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004