On Fallout 3

The RPGDot Forums (thanks Reijo Niemi) recap the mentions made of Fallout 3 during Interplay's conference call:
On Fallout 3, Caen said "Fallout 3 is not actively being developed right now and we will have an announcement soon on that project". Later, several questions were posed by an investor. The exchange went as follows, starting with a question clarifying whether IPLAY would develop or publish Fallout 3:

Caen: We plan on publishing Fallout 3

Caller: Most likely it will be done through an external studio, correct?

Caen: Correct.
View : : :
11.
 
Re: No subject
Apr 17, 2004, 01:51
11.
Re: No subject Apr 17, 2004, 01:51
Apr 17, 2004, 01:51
 
tim cain invented the wasteland RPG concept in wasteland

I could be mistaken but I don't believe that Tim Cain had anything to do with the development of Wasteland. Yeah, just did some searching, Cain's name isn't associated with the Apple II game called Wasteland. http://www.mobygames.com/game/credits/p,2/gameId,287/

then Fallout 1 and 2

Fallout 1, yes. Fallout 2, no. He had already left Interplay.

I doubt you can say he would not be capable

I don't doubt that Tim is a good game designer. What I doubt is his ability to manage a project. Arcanum and ToEE had some good ideas but both utterly failed in the execution, to my mind that is indicative of poor project management more than anything else.

The reason why I'd rather have Obsidian is A) they have all the Fallout 2/Planescape: Torment era BIS talent and B) Feargus Urquhart is there and he has demonstrated the ability to be a producer, something Tim Cain hasn't done. Obsidian hasn't released anything yet so I can't know for certain if it will be a successful developer, but I do know that the people there have worked successfully together in the past. Troika on the otherhand has only shown two horribly flawed games.

This comment was edited on Apr 17, 01:56.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 16, 2004Apr 16 2004
2.
Apr 16, 2004Apr 16 2004
3.
Apr 16, 2004Apr 16 2004
4.
Apr 16, 2004Apr 16 2004
5.
Apr 16, 2004Apr 16 2004
6.
Apr 16, 2004Apr 16 2004
7.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
8.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
9.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
10.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
 11.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
 Re: No subject
12.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
13.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
14.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
18.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
21.
Apr 18, 2004Apr 18 2004
20.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
15.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
19.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
16.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004
17.
Apr 17, 2004Apr 17 2004