Brothers in Arms Revealed

The teasing on Gearbox Software's War Story Website has culminated in the announcement of Brothers in Arms, the title of this upcoming World War II game they hope represents "the most realistic and authentic WWII shooter ever." Here's a bit:
Ubisoft, one of the world's largest video game publishers, today reinforces its strategy to dominate the war games market by announcing a long-term deal with award-winning developer Gearbox Software to publish a new military franchise: Brothers in Arms(tm). With its breakthrough squad-based combat mechanism and unprecedented realism, the first game in the series is poised to revolutionize the WWII genre when it ships on consoles and PC starting Holiday 2004. Created by Texas-based Gearbox Software, Brothers in Arms is the most realistic and authentic WWII shooter ever. While other WWII games have sugarcoated the war experience, Brothers in Arms is based on a true story and will immerse gamers into the gritty, uncensored and emotionally-charged side of war. The game puts you in the shoes of Sgt. Matt Baker, a D-Day paratrooper squad leader, and asks you to lead the squad as you balance their lives with the success of the mission. The true stories and historical events you experience on your perilous journey take you through real battlefields meticulously recreated from aerial reconnaissance images, US Army Signal Corps photos and eye-witness accounts of war-torn Normandy. Players of all skill levels can battle their way through this intense experience because of Brothers in Arms innovative and accessible command and control system."
The first screenshots from the game are in UGO's Brothers in Arms Preview, which includes some first-hand impressions and offers some details not included in the press release.
View : : :
57.
 
Looks nice
Apr 13, 2004, 21:52
S.L
57.
Looks nice Apr 13, 2004, 21:52
Apr 13, 2004, 21:52
S.L
 
That one screenshot of the assault definitely looks nice, game reminds you of COD tho- but we'll see how well Gearbox pulls this off...

New Point of view for WWII games is a good suggestion... I've always wanted to play from a german point of view and perhaps the russian front? or africa campaign?

who knows wut publishers will agree on in the future

Date
Subject
Author
1.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
22.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
25.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
2.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
3.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
4.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
5.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
6.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
7.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
8.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
9.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
10.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
11.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
15.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
17.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
20.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
21.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
16.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
12.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
14.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
23.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
26.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
27.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
43.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
44.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
45.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
48.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
49.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
        <YAWN>
50.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
         Re: <YAWN>
61.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
62.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
         Re: I don`t trust GearBox
63.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
          No subject
64.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
           Re: No subject
65.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
            Re: No subject
72.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
          Re: I don`t trust GearBox
73.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
           Re: I don`t trust GearBox
28.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
29.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
     WW2 Again?
13.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
18.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
19.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
31.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
24.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
30.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
32.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
37.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
33.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
34.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
38.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
39.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
40.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
41.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
35.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
36.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
42.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
46.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
56.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
47.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
51.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
52.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
53.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
54.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
55.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
58.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
60.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
 57.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
Looks nice
59.
Apr 13, 2004Apr 13 2004
66.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
67.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
68.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
69.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
70.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
89.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
77.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
80.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
82.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
83.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
84.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
       Re: Historical Aspect
85.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
86.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
87.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
       Re: Historical Aspect
71.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
74.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
75.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
   Re: Sigh
76.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
78.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
88.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
79.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
81.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
90.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
91.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
92.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
93.
Apr 14, 2004Apr 14 2004
95.
Apr 19, 2004Apr 19 2004
94.
Apr 15, 2004Apr 15 2004
96.
Apr 20, 2004Apr 20 2004
97.
Apr 20, 2004Apr 20 2004