Carmack at GDC Follow-up

To follow-up on the discrepancy between the two accounts of John Carmack's address at the GDC yesterday, a reader named Rene Patnode who attended the talk offers his perspective saying the HomeLAN Fed account is the more accurate of the two: "I can tell you that HomeLan Fed is a LOT closer to the truth. He mentioned Quake II as a former possible idea, but it was only that. What he did say was that the likely next id game will be a slight variation of Doom 3.... I personally would expect a mission pack or something on the order of Team Arena. Pretty close is also better than really close." Likewise, GameSpy's Carmack Address Recap likewise confirms that it was Computer and Video Games that came away with the wrong take on the facts here:
One interesting idea that Carmack said was discussed early on in DOOM 3's development was a product specifically meant to be a rendering showcase. In this case, the idea was to do a "Quake 2 remix" - to rebuild the game using all-new assets and technology. "But even the idea of just reskinning an old game brings with it the problems that as we have newer graphics technology, media creation demands get worse and worse..."
View : : :
30.
 
Re: Observation
Mar 26, 2004, 17:23
30.
Re: Observation Mar 26, 2004, 17:23
Mar 26, 2004, 17:23
 
Kreilo, you missed the whole point of "technological innovation aside"

Maybe I should have said... It's been about about a decade since id produced a product that wasn't preceeded or suffixed with a number.

All sequels and prequels aside, we have Wolfenstein, Doom, and Quake. Nazi's, Demon's and Alien's respectively.

There's nothing wrong with deathmatch, but I just prefer original concepts and hero's like in American McGee's Alice, or Deus Ex (the first one), the Thief games, Max Payne, etc.
___________________________________________
My Blog = http://the.postingstation.com
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
2.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
3.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
4.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
32.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
48.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
5.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
6.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
7.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
12.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
15.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
27.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
28.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
29.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
44.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
22.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
39.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
52.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
54.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
55.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
8.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
9.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
10.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
11.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
19.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
20.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
23.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
24.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
25.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
31.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
     Re: Observation
13.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
14.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
16.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
26.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
17.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
18.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
34.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
21.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
38.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
47.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
51.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
53.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
56.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
57.
Mar 28, 2004Mar 28 2004
58.
Mar 28, 2004Mar 28 2004
 30.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
Re: Observation
43.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
33.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
35.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
37.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
45.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
46.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
50.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
36.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
40.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
41.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
42.
Mar 26, 2004Mar 26 2004
49.
Mar 27, 2004Mar 27 2004
59.
Mar 31, 2004Mar 31 2004
60.
Apr 1, 2004Apr 1 2004
61.
Apr 1, 2004Apr 1 2004