Sam & Max Sequel Axed

LucasArts has posted the announcement of cancellation of Sam & Max Freelance Police, planned as a sequel to Sam & Max Hit the Road, their classic adventure game (thanks Quboid). Word is:
"After careful evaluation of current market place realities and underlying economic considerations, we've decided that this was not the appropriate time to launch a graphic adventure on the PC" says Mike Nelson, Acting General Manager and VP of Finance and Operations. There is currently no plan to reduce staff.
View : : :
22.
 
Re: Full Throttle, Now This...
Mar 3, 2004, 15:13
22.
Re: Full Throttle, Now This... Mar 3, 2004, 15:13
Mar 3, 2004, 15:13
 
Being a follower of LucasArts since it was a division of LucasFilm in the early 80's (Rescue on Fractalus, Koronis Rift, etc), through the hey-day of adventuring (Maniac Mansion, Zak McKracken, Day of the Tentacle, Full Throttle, Sam & Max, Loom, The Dig, Grim Fandango, The Monkey Island series, and more - their resume consists ONLY of hits in the genre!)... even though I worked at Sierra in the late 90's, I always felt that the Lucas adventure games were the best. They combined wit, good stories, thought-provoking situations, and puzzles tough enough to enjoy but not frustrating or deadly (like Sierra's).

Then what happened? Lucas announced he was going to make the Star Wars prequels. It seems natural that they would gear LucasArts towards Star Wars games... But EXCLUSIVELY? Yet they did so. Thus followed a million-and-one clones of already-made games with a Star Wars veneer slathered over them.

To me its no wonder the new Adventure titles were cancelled or weren't coming together: The SW Prequels have been in the works for something like 6 years now. Game designers are impatient, creative people. I can't imagine the quality minds that came up with the adventure-game stories & designs sticking around through the SW drudgery (at least not without becoming zombies)... So I'm *SURE* LucasArts has experienced its share of "brain-drain" over the last several years. I don't know where the quality designers have scattered to, but I doubt the creative teams responsible for past success are still there.

And on the subject of "no market for adventure games" - that's just Bullsh!t. Sure, you're not going to have a multi-million-copy seller (oh, wait - what about Myst???)... But you can certainly have successful (in a business-sense) adventure-games.

The reason we don't see adventure games selling well these days, is because no one is making them - but that in and of itself is NOT a valid argument for why they can't be made and sold in a decent fashion. We've just gotten into a "chicken or egg" situation in the industry over this genre. I remember when LucasArts / LucasFilm was a creative powerhouse and would take risks and try new things... They were the sort of company that would push THROUGH the "chicken or egg" situation, make a quality product, and see how it did at-market. Nowadays, with the competition, consolidation, big-budgets, etc... NO ONE wants to take any more risks than they absolutely have to.

Which is sad, because many of our biggest blockbusters in history came from risky concepts. I sincerely hope that small developers fill this void; although having worked in the industry, I don't know how plausible that is - I certainly know how challenging it is!

Take care,

--Noel "HB" Wade


Date
Subject
Author
1.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
6.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
9.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
85.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
2.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
3.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
7.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
4.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
5.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
8.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
10.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
11.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
13.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
14.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
15.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
17.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
18.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
 22.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
     Re: Full Throttle, Now This...
24.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
23.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
32.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
34.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
37.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
43.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
19.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
20.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
27.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
33.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
16.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
21.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
26.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
54.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
28.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
35.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
36.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
38.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
42.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
25.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
46.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
63.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
86.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
87.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
89.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
88.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
91.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
29.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
30.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
31.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
39.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
40.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
41.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
44.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
45.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
47.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
50.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
51.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
64.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
65.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
73.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
79.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
    Re: Yup...
48.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
49.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
56.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
58.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
59.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
61.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
52.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
53.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
55.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
57.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
60.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
62.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
66.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
67.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
68.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
69.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
70.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
71.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
72.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
74.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
75.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
76.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
77.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
82.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
83.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
78.
Mar 3, 2004Mar 3 2004
80.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
81.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
84.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004
90.
Mar 4, 2004Mar 4 2004