Spector of a New Tomb Raider?

Warren Spector & Tomb Raider? on Shacknews has information gleaned from a print issue of the Official Xbox Magazine suggesting that ION Storm designer Warren Spector may be getting his hands on Lara Croft and aid in the design of the next Tomb Raider game.
View : : :
44.
 
Re: No subject
Mar 1, 2004, 03:00
44.
Re: No subject Mar 1, 2004, 03:00
Mar 1, 2004, 03:00
 
There's a little sequence where two Order Seekers try to kill a pair of scientists. While you can shoot them down easy enough, you do have a few seconds to come up with some other solution. Here's mine: I rolled one of the gas barrels to the base of the nearby stairs and then placed a proximity mine right next to it. The first Order Seeker was killed by the blast from the mine. The mine also had the effect of blowing up the gas barrel and enshrouding the second seeker in poison gas. Going to those lengths to kill the seekers was totally unnecessary, shooting them is far simpler and just as easy, but it was far far more satisfying.

I actually tried that. The first time the computer decided to hiccup and froze for a few seconds, by which time I recovered and found 'ole Alex a puddle of goo on the ground. I think it was quite satisfying the second go though.

I admit I love when people try and argue at innane points, but everyone needs a hobby. Yay for the internet, three cheers!

Or irriate, annoy, agrivate, subjugate, be belligerant, resentful, hateful, disrespectful, cryful, whiny, argumentative, or just troll-like in general...

This comment was edited on Mar 1, 03:06.
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
2.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
3.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
4.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
5.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
6.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
9.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
10.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
11.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
     Re: No subject
7.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
8.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
16.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
24.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
35.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
47.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
12.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
13.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
14.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
15.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
17.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
18.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
19.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
20.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
21.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
22.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
26.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
41.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
25.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
27.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
28.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
30.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
31.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
34.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
36.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
37.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
32.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
33.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
38.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
39.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
40.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
42.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
45.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
46.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
   LOL
43.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
 44.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
 Re: No subject