Spector of a New Tomb Raider?

Warren Spector & Tomb Raider? on Shacknews has information gleaned from a print issue of the Official Xbox Magazine suggesting that ION Storm designer Warren Spector may be getting his hands on Lara Croft and aid in the design of the next Tomb Raider game.
View : : :
35.
 
Re: Come on guys
Feb 29, 2004, 19:22
35.
Re: Come on guys Feb 29, 2004, 19:22
Feb 29, 2004, 19:22
 
Congrats on coming up with one of the single dumbest statements I have ever read on this forum.

And thanks for that intelligent response. The reason I stated that I dislike EA Sports games is because I've played them, as have many of my hardcore gamer friends. Are they all that bad? Not really no. But the fact is that they do not garner the ratings that they are getting. The fact that a number of game sites give them similar ranking is irrelevant. I earlier used GameSpot as an example, for the fact that they give just about every EA title (not every one, but most) high ratings. Most other sites do too. If you look around, you'll see very few sites willing to really take a stab at EA games. And when EA releases a game that's so bad or unpolished that they just can't give it something near the top (and this does happen), they still give it a rating that's low, but higher than the title deserves. NFS Undergound and Nascar Thunder 2004 aren't bad, but they aren't that great and neither are the other EA titles out there. Many publishers are guilty of pushing out unfinished, untested garbage or just trying to milk a long-standing series, but EA has consistently been the worst at this. Many modern gamers buy titles purely because of reviews (though many won't admit it; these are usually the casual gamers who fall into this category) and when they spent a lot of money on a highly-rated title that they now can't return, they'll learn to like it. I personally believe that if a lot of large publisher games out there got more realistic ratings, they would sell more relative to what they should based on their quality.

The fact is that you say my statement is dumb because people continue to buy EA Sports games. Well, almost no one here agrees that Enter the Matrix was a good game, but that sold didn't it? Will its sequel sell too? Yes it will! Simply because many gamers see the name and bought it. Will people buy the next NHL and NFL games despite that they're paying $50 just to get an updated team roster and slightly improved engine? Absolutely they will. I remember back in the good old days where you paid like $9.99 for a roster expansion disc to a sports title. You got the updated players that you wanted to stay current, but you weren't paying for the SAME GAME over and over again. That's where my problem is. People are willing to do that, but they are calling the Tomb Raider series dead after one game that didn't do so hot. See what I'm getting at? Probably not, but oh well, I tried.


Parallax Abstraction
This comment was edited on Feb 29, 19:23.
Parallax Abstraction
Twitch | YouTube | Podcast
Avatar 13614
Date
Subject
Author
1.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
2.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
3.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
4.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
5.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
6.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
9.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
10.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
11.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
     Re: No subject
7.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
8.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
16.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
24.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
 35.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
   Re: Come on guys
47.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
12.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
13.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
14.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
15.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
17.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
18.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
19.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
20.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
21.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
22.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
26.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
41.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
25.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
27.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
28.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
30.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
31.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
34.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
36.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
37.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
32.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
33.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
38.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
39.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
40.
Feb 29, 2004Feb 29 2004
42.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
45.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
46.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
   LOL
43.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004
44.
Mar 1, 2004Mar 1 2004